2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14040960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Nighttime Cloud Cover Products from MODIS and Himawari-8 Data with Ground-Based Camera Observations

Abstract: Comparing cloud cover (CC) products from different satellites with the same ground-based CC dataset provides information on the similarities or differences of values among satellite products. For this reason, 42-month CC products from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer’s (MODIS) Collection 6.1 daily cloud cover products (MOD06_L2, MYD06_L2, MOD08_D3, and MYD08_D3) and Himawari-8 are compared with the ground-based camera datasets. The comparison shows that CC from MODIS differs from ground measurement CC … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to this reason, Himawari-8 cannot identify the variability of the hourly clear sky fractions. As discussed by Lagrosas et al (2022), Himawari-8 has a limitation in detecting low altitude (<2 km) clouds, especially the small fragments. On some occasions, the occurrences of low-altitude clouds, mainly in the first half of the night, were confirmed during several site visits.…”
Section: Temporal Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to this reason, Himawari-8 cannot identify the variability of the hourly clear sky fractions. As discussed by Lagrosas et al (2022), Himawari-8 has a limitation in detecting low altitude (<2 km) clouds, especially the small fragments. On some occasions, the occurrences of low-altitude clouds, mainly in the first half of the night, were confirmed during several site visits.…”
Section: Temporal Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The divergence between the SQM-based and satellite-based results hinders us from firmly confirming the ground truth. In-situ observation usually is regarded as a better way to characterise an astronomical site compared to the remote sensing approach (Lagrosas et al 2022). However, zenithal sky brightness measurement is not an ultimate way of monitoring the sky, considering how narrow the field of view of the instrument is compared to the whole observable sky.…”
Section: Monthmentioning
confidence: 99%