1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1986.tb14280.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Neurological “Soft Signs” in Adolescents: Reliability Studies

Abstract: SUMMARY The validity and reliability of a scoring system for ‘neurological soft signs’ in teenagers was assessed. Six scales were adapted and fitted into the framework of a conventional neurological examination. The following emerged: (a) each of the three multi‐item scales had high internal consistency; (b) inter‐rater agreement on mirror movements of ‘live’ subjects was satisfactory; (c) ratings of videotapes agreed among examiners for mirror movements and dysdiadochokinesis but not for choreiform movements;… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The neurodevelopmental examination used in our previous study has not been validated for use with teenagers, so we used the test battery and scoring system described by Stokman et al (1986), for which extensive reliability and validity data are available. The items included assess astereognosis, dysgraphaesthesia, dysdiadochokinesis, mirror movements, motor slowness and involuntary movements.…”
Section: Neurodevelopmental Test Battery Wdt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neurodevelopmental examination used in our previous study has not been validated for use with teenagers, so we used the test battery and scoring system described by Stokman et al (1986), for which extensive reliability and validity data are available. The items included assess astereognosis, dysgraphaesthesia, dysdiadochokinesis, mirror movements, motor slowness and involuntary movements.…”
Section: Neurodevelopmental Test Battery Wdt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NSS are traditionally screened in the clinical examination of young children and there are different operational scales to classify and quantify them, 1–3 sometimes subdividing them into motor and sensory signs, which have different reliabilities 4 . Yet, in spite of their widespread use, the neural basis and the clinical significance of NSS are still a matter of debate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are detailed studies about test–retest and interobserver reliability of the different NSS 3,4,11 and studies on their particular association with developmental disorders 6,7 or cognitive abilities, 12 with a few exceptions, 11 there is little knowledge about their evolution beyond late childhood. This is an essential piece of information to define the boundaries of normality, i.e., the age beyond which they are expected to disappear and to understand their natural evolution, assuming that their presence during a certain phase can be interpreted as a sign of normal development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A structured neurological assessment of the children was carried out using the Neurodevelopmental Screen developed by Michelsson et al 4 , a modification of the test of Bax and Whitmore 98 that also includes items from the Berges-Lezine imitation of gestures as well as Gubbay 99 test. Other standardized tests and measures used over the course of the follow-up include the Stott Test of Motor Impairment 100 , Neurological "Soft signs" in Adolescence 101 Dubowitz developmental screening test 102 , The Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities 103 (ITPA Finnish version 104 ), Goodenough Draw-a-person test 105 , Frostig Developmental Test of Visual Perception 106 , subtests from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 107 (WISC Finnish version 108 ) and subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 109 (WAIS Finnish version 110 ). At the age of 16 part of the cohort was also assessed with more detailed neuropsychological instruments including the Benton Visual Memory Test 111 and subtests from the Wechsler Memory Scale 112 (WMS Finnish version 113 ).…”
Section: Methods and Outcomes In Childhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%