2011
DOI: 10.1002/jps.22506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Net Charge and Protein–Protein Interactions of Different Monoclonal Antibodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
147
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
17
147
0
Order By: Relevance
“…k D has been used to assess the net interaction potential for proteins by several researchers, 21,44,45 and a strong correlation between k D and A 2 has been demonstrated recently. 44 While both k D and A 2 are measured generally over the same concentration ranges, k D may be measured at much lower volumes using microplate based QELS instrumentation and has the potential to be used in high throughput screening. While second virial coefficient values or equilibrium phase transitions are more widely used to measure interaction potentials, we believe that k D is a convenient and reproducible way to assess colloidal stability.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…k D has been used to assess the net interaction potential for proteins by several researchers, 21,44,45 and a strong correlation between k D and A 2 has been demonstrated recently. 44 While both k D and A 2 are measured generally over the same concentration ranges, k D may be measured at much lower volumes using microplate based QELS instrumentation and has the potential to be used in high throughput screening. While second virial coefficient values or equilibrium phase transitions are more widely used to measure interaction potentials, we believe that k D is a convenient and reproducible way to assess colloidal stability.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 Similar trends in viscosity in response to changes in solution conditions that we describe here for mAb-C have been reported for other IgG1 mAbs, where the extent of viscosity increased in a concentration-dependent manner with increasing ionic strength 11,18,30,53,54 and solution pH, 11,55 related to elevated levels of protein RSA due to charge shielding effects. [56][57][58] The isoelectric point (pI) range of mAb-C is basic (pI»9.1-9.4), 45 and therefore, the overall surface charge of mAb-C is expected to be positive at neutral pH. As the pH was changed from 6 to 8, the tendency of mAb-C to self-associate increased, possibly due to overall decrease in electrostatic repulsive interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique was classically used in studies of multiple myeloma (4) and is currently used for analyzing the degradation of monoclonal antibodies (14,24,61). IEF has also been used in the study of the humoral response to a number of pathogens (10, 11, 15, 17, 20-22, 30, 37, 39, 45, 46, 50, 51, 55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%