Assessment of Near-Surface Geophysical Methods Used to Discover Karst Bauxite Deposits in the Dinarides Using the Example of Posušje Area, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Geophysical exploration of bauxite deposits has been carried out in the area of Posušje in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which were formed on an Upper Cretaceous carbonate substrate, whereas the hanging wall rocks can be Paleogene limestones and sedimentary clastic rocks. Karst terrains are demanding for geophysical exploration due to the relatively complex geological relationships and exceptional near-surface inhomogeneities that generate large noises and challenging conditions for taking field measurements. The fundamental question is whether geophysical research can detect exceptionally irregular karst bauxite deposits with relatively small dimensions. The basic idea is to combine several geophysical methods and a joint interpretation of several data sets to increase the efficiency of geophysical surveying in detecting complex bauxite deposits in karst terrains. Therefore, fundamental near-surface research methods, electrical tomography and seismic refraction are used. In addition, magnetometry was used to examine whether bauxite deposits yield potential magnetic anomalies that could help in detecting them. Research undertaken in the area of Posušje was carried out in the first step on already discovered and known bauxite deposits to determine whether geophysical responses correlate with the occurrence of bauxite deposits and to evaluate the effectiveness of each of the applied surface geophysical methods. Measurements were taken at several locations, and results for two micro-locations, Krstače and Mratnjača, are shown. Geophysical measurements were firstly performed on discovered bauxite deposits in order to reliably determine the possibility of identifying deposits in geophysical inverse models. Bauxite deposits were clearly recognised as characteristic geophysical responses in inversion models using both methods, electrical tomography and seismic refraction. Although the response of bauxite deposits is expressed in both models, resistivity and velocity, it is much more evident in resistivity models. The characteristic resistivity response was confirmed by the discovery of a new deposit. Therefore, the conclusion is that electrical resistivity tomography should be considered a basic method for exploring karst bauxite deposits. Seismic refraction provides a better characterisation of deposits and reduces the interpretation ambiguity. This solution can generally be applied to the problem of researching bauxite deposits in the Dinarides and similar geological models in the Mediterranean. Magnetometric measurements have shown that no magnetic anomalies could be associated with bauxite deposits, and only magnetometry was not successful in discovering bauxite deposits.