The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Communication Disorders in Multicultural and International Populations 2012
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-06699-0.00021-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of multicultural and international clients with communication disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the time of Washington’s review, few non-biased tools existed and attempts to renorm or adjust existing tools were deemed inadequate for nonmainstream English-speaking children. Unfortunately, although many assessment tools within the field have been revised or recently developed to better address the needs of nonmainstream English-speaking children, test biases continue to be identified (e.g., Gutierrez-Clellen & Simon-Cerijido, 2007; Hammer, Pennock-Roman, Rzasa, & Tomblin, 2002; Qi, Kaiser, Milan, & Hancock, 2006; Restrepo et al, 2006; Thomas-Tate, Washington, & Edwards, 2004; Woods, Pena, & Martin, 2004; Wyatt, 2012). …”
Section: Test Biasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the time of Washington’s review, few non-biased tools existed and attempts to renorm or adjust existing tools were deemed inadequate for nonmainstream English-speaking children. Unfortunately, although many assessment tools within the field have been revised or recently developed to better address the needs of nonmainstream English-speaking children, test biases continue to be identified (e.g., Gutierrez-Clellen & Simon-Cerijido, 2007; Hammer, Pennock-Roman, Rzasa, & Tomblin, 2002; Qi, Kaiser, Milan, & Hancock, 2006; Restrepo et al, 2006; Thomas-Tate, Washington, & Edwards, 2004; Woods, Pena, & Martin, 2004; Wyatt, 2012). …”
Section: Test Biasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some may refer to the position statement on social dialects that was published by the American Speech-Language-and Hearing Association (ASHA, 1983). Others may cite work by Stockman (1996, 2000), Wyatt (2012), and others to explain test biases, both historical and present, that limit one’s ability to evaluate and ultimately serve nonmainstream English-speaking children. Still others may cite work by Seymour et al to describe nonmainstream English-speaking children’s use of contrastive and noncontrastive grammar structures and to argue for the former to be excluded from assessment (Pearson & Ciolli, 2004; Seymour, 2004; Seymour, Bland-Stewart, & Green, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models require using multiple measures, procedures, and contexts so as to gain as much data as possible about the individual. Many also emphasize the importance of testing the child in all of the languages they can speak or understand (32, 33). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are four primary kinds of test bias that could negatively impact the test scores of children who are culturally or linguistically diverse from the test population: linguistic, format, value, and situational biases (32, 38). Linguistic bias occurs when there are sounds, or types of grammar, syntax, or morphology, that do not exist in the test taker’s language.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation