2017
DOI: 10.2298/gensr1702583p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of molecular and phenotypic diversity among winter wheat cultivars

Abstract: Comparing results of different genetic diversity estimates can be useful in parental selection for plant breeders. Forty winter wheat cultivars, from three Croatian breeding centres and four foreign countries, were used to utilize and compare agronomic, morphologic and molecular based genetic diversity estimates. Ten morphologic descriptors according to UPOV guidelines and eight agronomic traits were used to establish phenotypic data. Molecular data consisted of 26 SSR and four combinations of AFLP markers, co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very weak correlations between morphologic and molecular data were also reported by Cupic et al (2009). No correlations between phenotypic and molecular data were found Petrovic et al (2017), implying that both types of data should be used for genetic diversity estimates in order to cover wider variability between tested cultivars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Very weak correlations between morphologic and molecular data were also reported by Cupic et al (2009). No correlations between phenotypic and molecular data were found Petrovic et al (2017), implying that both types of data should be used for genetic diversity estimates in order to cover wider variability between tested cultivars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since the development of biotechnologies, molecular marker techniques, such as AFLP, SSR and SNP, have been widely used in the analysis of genetic diversity in common wheat (CHAO et al, 2010;PETROVIC et al, 2017). But all of them have various degrees of limitations (AKBARI et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both genotypes included in this research are Croatian genotypes, released in the year 1989 (Srpanjka) and 2006 (Renata). There are some similarities between genotypes in agronomic traits due to the genotype Renata pedigree (Srpanjka was one of Renata’s parents) [ 35 ]. Although these genotypes differ in quality traits [ 36 ], they are similar in grain yield (as confirmed by this study) ( Table 3 ) and plant height, two traits that are very often related to the mineral content of grain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%