Assessment of Mobile Health Apps Using Built-In Smartphone Sensors for Diagnosis and Treatment: Systematic Survey of Apps Listed in International Curated Health App Libraries

Abstract

Background More than a million health and well-being apps are available from the Apple and Google app stores. Some apps use built-in mobile phone sensors to generate health data. Clinicians and patients can find information regarding safe and effective mobile health (mHealth) apps in third party–curated mHealth app libraries. Objective These independent Web-based repositories guide app selection from trusted lists, but do they offer apps using ubiquitous, low-cost smartphone sensors to improve health? This study aimed to identify the types of built-in mobile phone sensors used in apps listed on curated health app libraries, the range of health conditions these apps address, and the cross-platform availability of the apps. Methods This systematic survey reviewed three such repositories (National Health Service Apps Library, AppScript, and MyHealthApps), assessing the availability of apps using built-in mobile phone sensors for the diagnosis or treatment of health conditions. Results A total of 18 such apps were identified and included in this survey, representing 1.1% (8/699) to 3% (2/76) of all apps offered by the respective libraries examined. About one-third (7/18, 39%) of the identified apps offered cross-platform Apple and Android versions, with a further 50% (9/18) only dedicated to Apple and 11% (2/18), to Android. About one-fourth (4/18, 22%) of the identified apps offered dedicated diagnostic functions, with a majority featuring therapeutic (9/18, 50%) or combined functionality (5/18, 28%). Cameras, touch screens, and microphones were the most frequently used built-in sensors. Health concerns addressed by these apps included respiratory, dermatological, neurological, and anxiety conditions. Conclusions Diligent mHealth app library curation, medical device regulation constraints, and cross-platform differences in mobile phone sensor architectures may all contribute to the observed limited availability of mHealth apps using built-in phone sensors in curated mHealth app libraries. However, more efforts are needed to increase the number of such apps on curated lists, as they offer easily accessible low-cost options to assist people in managing clinical conditions.

Smartphone and Mobile Health Apps for Tinnitus: Systematic Identification, Analysis, and Assessment

“…We also performed searches on 3 independent third-party mHealth app libraries: (1) the government-funded National Health Service Apps Library [ 41 ], (2) the privately funded AppScript Library [ 42 ], and (3) the privately funded MyHealthApps Cochrane Library [ 43 ]. These third-party mHealth app libraries are web portals that curate smartphone apps [ 44 ]. This ancillary search of smartphone apps on webpages, tinnitus forums, and third-party mHealth app libraries resulted in the identification of 5 additional apps; therefore, a total of 34 apps were identified for assessment and evaluation.…”

Crowdsourcing Users’ Comments for Clinical and Operational Features Analysis of Diabetes Mobile Apps

“…By relying on the experience of unhappy users, valuable comments were obtained to validate developers claimed performances, hence helping to answer Q3. This makes it possible to know the true state of the clinical and operational features, thus, highlighting the important design and development flaws, which are common with many of the apps [2,37]. Since the best way to determine the effectiveness of DMAS feature utilization will involve statistical analysis, we were able to answer Q4 using the frequency of features utilization and statistical analysis that hinged on ANOVA.…”

“…This era of Internet connectivity has transformed our lifestyles to be more online and reliant on mobile apps to provide us with information and support concerning wellness and self-management of chronic conditions [1]. Thus, it should be of no surprise that over 1 million mobile health apps [2] have been downloaded over 3.7 billion times [3] because most of these are advertised as vital tools for managing chronic conditions such as diabetes. Unfortunately, the ubiquitous nature of these apps has not translated into quality products [4], hence, there exists a key need to understand the challenges of such apps and identify critical enablers to facilitate better designs.…”

Impact of mobile health and medical applications on clinical practice in gastroenterology

“…In the identified apps, microphones, mobile phone speakers and accelerometers were used more rarely. None of the included apps used GPS[ 75 ]. These data can be correlated longitudinally and continuously to forecast critical or medically relevant situations[ 76 ].…”