2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11694-020-00733-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of milk fat based on signal-to-ground voltage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The milk with different amount of fat is described from its mien, texture, and taste (McCarthy et al, 2017;Soukoulis et al, 2010). Recently, different novel technologies and methods have been studied among milk fat evaluation and assessment, such as fluorescent sensor (Xu et al, 2014), Spectralsensitive Pulsed Photometry (Ragni et al, 2016), Dielectric (Zhu et al, 2015), molecular distillation (Berti et al, 2018), HPLC-UV detection (Abdellatif et al, 2020), electromagnetic (Wu et al, 2021) and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) (Sacchi et al, 2018). In addition, long evaluation time, high instrumental 4 cost, complex pre-treatment of the samples and use of expertise for measurements and analysis are some limitations, defects, and disadvantages of previous studies for milk fat evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The milk with different amount of fat is described from its mien, texture, and taste (McCarthy et al, 2017;Soukoulis et al, 2010). Recently, different novel technologies and methods have been studied among milk fat evaluation and assessment, such as fluorescent sensor (Xu et al, 2014), Spectralsensitive Pulsed Photometry (Ragni et al, 2016), Dielectric (Zhu et al, 2015), molecular distillation (Berti et al, 2018), HPLC-UV detection (Abdellatif et al, 2020), electromagnetic (Wu et al, 2021) and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) (Sacchi et al, 2018). In addition, long evaluation time, high instrumental 4 cost, complex pre-treatment of the samples and use of expertise for measurements and analysis are some limitations, defects, and disadvantages of previous studies for milk fat evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%