2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of metal strand wire pre-stress in anchor head by ultrasonics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the frequency of 1 MHz (period of 1 ms) more than 30 elements were used to describe the wave, with a stable time increment of 0.0712 ms. For the frequency of 5 MHz (period of 0.2 ms) the time step was 0.0555 ms still sufficing the requirement of at least 10 elements/wave length, while the wavelength was 1.2 mm, being 10 times longer than the mesh size, which is considered a minimum value to be respected so that the numerical presentation of the wave should be correct. 18,19 The used material in this simulation is considered as linear-elastic, homogeneous, and isotropic. Boundary conditions were assumed as symmetry on (xz) plan and (yz).…”
Section: Elastic Wave Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the frequency of 1 MHz (period of 1 ms) more than 30 elements were used to describe the wave, with a stable time increment of 0.0712 ms. For the frequency of 5 MHz (period of 0.2 ms) the time step was 0.0555 ms still sufficing the requirement of at least 10 elements/wave length, while the wavelength was 1.2 mm, being 10 times longer than the mesh size, which is considered a minimum value to be respected so that the numerical presentation of the wave should be correct. 18,19 The used material in this simulation is considered as linear-elastic, homogeneous, and isotropic. Boundary conditions were assumed as symmetry on (xz) plan and (yz).…”
Section: Elastic Wave Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already mentioned, the interphase obtained different values of stiffness expressed by the corresponding longitudinal wave velocities. This is a key parameter of the study and a practical way to simulate different contact levels between the matrix material and the fiber [11, 15]. Specifically, the lowest value was 300 m/s (case of loose interphase similar to air), and the maximum 11770 m/s which is the longitudinal wave velocity of the fiber.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diameter of the fiber is 142  μ m, and it is embedded 100  μ m below the surface, (see Figure 2). Since there was no physical insight for the thickness of the actual interphase layer, it was set to 50  μ m. In similar cases, it has been shown that the thickness of the interphase does not make critical difference in the results [11]. The vertical distance of the pulser was indicatively set to 1 mm above the surface of the specimen, while it can be adjusted to suit the relevant experimental geometry each time.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Detecting prestress near the anchor head may indicate any potential loss in prestress. Kleitsa et al [15] demonstrated that the propagation time and amplitude of ultrasonic waves can provide insight into changes in contact pressure between the steel strand and the anchor head.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%