2017
DOI: 10.9755/ejfa.2016-10-1530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of male sterility and antioxidant enzyme activities induced by the chemical hybridization agent SQ-1 in Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is generally used as spray for production of male sterile lines at commercial level. SQ-1 has been used to induced male sterility in wheat (Liu et al, 2018), common millet (Cui, 2008), 95-100 % male sterility by spraying at an optimum dosage in foxtail (Song et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2017), > 90 % male sterility at 5.0 kg ha-1 in Maize (Wei et al, 2012).…”
Section: Chemical Hybridizing Agents (Chas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally used as spray for production of male sterile lines at commercial level. SQ-1 has been used to induced male sterility in wheat (Liu et al, 2018), common millet (Cui, 2008), 95-100 % male sterility by spraying at an optimum dosage in foxtail (Song et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2017), > 90 % male sterility at 5.0 kg ha-1 in Maize (Wei et al, 2012).…”
Section: Chemical Hybridizing Agents (Chas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both species possess several significant advantages over related C4 panicoid grasses such as maize and sorghum, including short life cycle, small size, simple growth requirements and ease of transformation ( Brutnell et al, 2010 ). Difficulties with making controlled crosses between accessions, owing to small size of the individual flowers, has been addressed successfully by both temperature and chemical interventions to kill pollen in the female parent ( Jiang et al, 2013 ; Zhang H.Y. et al, 2017 ), and much work has also been done on overcoming seed dormancy issues ( Sebastian et al, 2014 ; Brenner et al, 2015 ; Acharya et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%