2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0818-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of lumbosacral kyphosis in spondylolisthesis: a computer-assisted reliability study of six measurement techniques

Abstract: Although recognized as an important aspect in the management of spondylolisthesis, there is no consensus on the most reliable and optimal measure of lumbosacral kyphosis (LSK). Using a custom computer software, four raters evaluated 60 standing lateral radiographs of the lumbosacral spine during two sessions at a 1-week interval. The sample size consisted of 20 normal, 20 low and 20 high grade spondylolisthetic subjects. Six parameters were included for analysis: Boxall's slip angle, Dubousset's lumbosacral an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason of LBP is the change of L1 to S1 joint angle. When it changes, the intervertebral disc is deteriorated and the spinal nerve could be compressed which causes the spinal pain13 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason of LBP is the change of L1 to S1 joint angle. When it changes, the intervertebral disc is deteriorated and the spinal nerve could be compressed which causes the spinal pain13 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general reason of back pain is compression of spinal nerve by partially herniated IVD. It occurs when the lumbosacral angle, L1 to L5 and S1, was changed (Glavas et al, 2009). The increase or decrease of lumbosacral lordosis provides the weight bearing to spine and IVD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excellent reliability in the measurement of LSK parameters has already been reported using this software. 5 All measurements were done by the same experienced observer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%