2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of long-term behavior of tuned mass dampers by system identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For leisure activities the dynamic response is fulfilled, however it was considered a tuned mass damper when the beam had a span length of 27.0 m. The high efficiency of the dampers in the reduction of the accelerations under a pedestrian walking is clearly seen in both panels. This reduction is very similar to the values obtained in [14].…”
Section: Figure 5: (A) Natural Frequencies (B) Maximum Vertical Accelsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…For leisure activities the dynamic response is fulfilled, however it was considered a tuned mass damper when the beam had a span length of 27.0 m. The high efficiency of the dampers in the reduction of the accelerations under a pedestrian walking is clearly seen in both panels. This reduction is very similar to the values obtained in [14].…”
Section: Figure 5: (A) Natural Frequencies (B) Maximum Vertical Accelsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Nevertheless, their numerical study was based on many simplifications, most notably their assumption of linearity of the soil's stress-strain behaviour. Furthermore, the efficiency with which TMDs operate in practice is often reduced considerably compared to theoretically developed responses [10]. In addition to these general drawbacks associated with theoretical studies that have been conducted on TMD performance, the bulk of such studies considered the long-established use of TMDs in windexcited structures, with the use of TMDs in seismically-excited structures being a relatively new concept that has not been as extensively explored [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies have pointed out that passive devices are hard to adjust once they are installed and their robustness is questionable when the host structure is subjected to different excitations. Since TMD can only reduce vibration components whose frequencies are close to the tuned frequencies, it is believed that the most significant limitation of the TMD is its narrow effective bandwidth and the high sensitivity to even a small change in the tuning [7][8][9][10]. Thus, it is considered to be unsuitable for vibration control under broadband earthquake inputs [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%