2015
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000001856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Calculation on Long-axis Views From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, in our patients and volunteers, global cardiac and systolic functional parameters like EDV, ESV, EF, and MM exhibited significant statistical differences between the two approaches, while the absolute differences where rather minor and the ICC was high to very high. These findings are similar to other CMR studies comparing the assessment of LV function using SAX and LAX datasets, and it should be reconsidered whether a statistically significant difference is actually clinically relevant [17,35]. Second, we only included a relatively small number of subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…First, in our patients and volunteers, global cardiac and systolic functional parameters like EDV, ESV, EF, and MM exhibited significant statistical differences between the two approaches, while the absolute differences where rather minor and the ICC was high to very high. These findings are similar to other CMR studies comparing the assessment of LV function using SAX and LAX datasets, and it should be reconsidered whether a statistically significant difference is actually clinically relevant [17,35]. Second, we only included a relatively small number of subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The study population was extracted from the single-center “REMI” (relation between aldosterone and cardiac REmodeling after Myocardial Infarction) cohort in which serial CMR and biomarker measurements were performed after reperfused acute MI [14, 15]. The study protocol, in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, was approved by the local Ethics Committee (CPP agreement n° 2009-A00537-50) and was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov site (NCT01109225).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different T1 mapping methods and parameter sets result in different ranges of T1 and ECV values for normal myocardium and blood [8, 10, 11]. Although previous studies have examined the impact of slice position in measuring other cardiac parameters in CMR imaging (such as left ventricular mass, volume and ejection fraction) [1214], very limited data are available today comparing T1 [15] and ECV measurements from short and long axis acquisitions [16, 17]. Despite this, current recommendations on T1 and ECV mapping in patients with global/diffuse cardiac disease [18] suggest adding a long axis map to aid analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%