2002
DOI: 10.2351/1.1494084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of laser Doppler perfusion imager’s in vivo reliability: Can it be used for a prospective analysis?

Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the laser Doppler perfusion imager (Lisca PIM 1.0; Lisca development, Linkoping, Sweden) for longitudinal analysis. We measured the skin blood flow under a biological zero condition at the forearm level in 84 patients enrolled in a 12 week prospective interventional trial. Since the biological zero is the background reading registered by the laser when blood flow has been occluded, any fluctuation of the measurements obtained under this condition can be at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blood perfusion is commonly assessed by non-invasive Laser Doppler Imaging (LDI), which measures blood flow through backscattering a laser beam that interacts with moving red blood cells [12,13]. While the non-invasive nature of LDI is highly desirable, it suffers from a lack of standardisation, poor temporal resolution, and can only penetrate tissue to a maximum depth of 10 mm [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood perfusion is commonly assessed by non-invasive Laser Doppler Imaging (LDI), which measures blood flow through backscattering a laser beam that interacts with moving red blood cells [12,13]. While the non-invasive nature of LDI is highly desirable, it suffers from a lack of standardisation, poor temporal resolution, and can only penetrate tissue to a maximum depth of 10 mm [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, Caselli et al (2002) concluded that LDI is a reliable and reproducible technique to assess the skin blood flow with a coefficient of variation of 16%. The error for the vessel diameter measurement by the automated detection algorithm is 0.5 pixel (Sun et al, 1995), or 8 m for the resolution of the digitized micrographs in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is capable of noninvasive and continuous recording of blood perfusion in tissue. A major limitation of laser Doppler technique is its inability to image tissue deeper than 1 mm [14][15][16][17][18]. Infrared thermography graphically depicts temperature gradients over a given body surface area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%