2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Language and Indexing Biases Among Chinese-Sponsored Randomized Clinical Trials

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Language and indexing biases may exist among Chinese-sponsored randomized clinical trials (CS-RCTs). Such biases may threaten the validity of systematic reviews. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the existence of language and indexing biases among CS-RCTs on drug interventions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this retrospective cohort study, eligible CS-RCTs were retrieved from trial registries, and bibliographic databases were searched to determine their publication status.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, although the eligible studies had an overall good methodological quality, in five trials a concealed allocation was not carried out [ 59 , 61 , 63 , 64 , 66 ], which could lead to an overestimation of the exercise training effects [ 86 ]. Lastly, the possibility of language bias should not be neglected because only studies published in English were considered to inclusion [ 87 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, although the eligible studies had an overall good methodological quality, in five trials a concealed allocation was not carried out [ 59 , 61 , 63 , 64 , 66 ], which could lead to an overestimation of the exercise training effects [ 86 ]. Lastly, the possibility of language bias should not be neglected because only studies published in English were considered to inclusion [ 87 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We searched three English bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL)), plus four Chinese bibliographic databases (SinoMed (formerly known as Chinese Biomedical Database), the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, and the China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP, http://qikan.cqvip.com )). 12 The supplemental file presents the search terms. We performed the initial search on 1 January 2020 and completed an updated search on 19 October 2020.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process to retrieve registry records from trial registries and the corresponding journal articles from bibliographic databases has been described previously. 20 Briefly, we considered RCTs to be eligible if…”
Section: Identifying Rcts From Trial Registries and Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, simply excluding the Chinese literature is inappropriate as it may lead to other negative consequences such as missing relevant RCTs. 14 Moreover, language bias has been found among RCTs from mainland China; excluding the Chinese literature may increase the risk of overestimating treatment effects, as RCTs with positive findings are more likely to be published inEnglish than those with negative findings 20. The coverage of Chinese journals by major English bibliographic databases has been increasing gradually while increasing numbers of systematic reviews have recently begun to include Chinese bibliographic databases to reduce bias 18.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%