2015
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2015.1007257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Landsat 7 Scan Line Corrector-off data gap-filling methods for seagrass distribution mapping

Abstract: Methods to predict and fill Landsat 7 Scan Line Corrector (SLC)-off data gaps are diverse and their usability is case specific. An appropriate gap-filling method that can be used for seagrass mapping applications has not been proposed previously. This study compared gapfilling methods for filling SLC-off data gaps with images acquired from different dates at similar mean sea-level tide heights, covering the Sungai Pulai estuary area inhabited by seagrass meadows in southern Peninsular Malaysia. To assess the g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GERALDINE masks cloud cover using the GEE built-in "simple cloud score" function (Housman et al 2018). This pixel-wise cloud probability score allows fast and efficient identification of clouds, suitable for large-scale analysis (Housman et al, 2018), and has been previously applied and well-justified for use in glacial environments (Scherler et al, 2018). A 20 % threshold is applied to every image, thereby excluding any pixel with a cloud score >20 % from the image.…”
Section: Cloud Maskingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GERALDINE masks cloud cover using the GEE built-in "simple cloud score" function (Housman et al 2018). This pixel-wise cloud probability score allows fast and efficient identification of clouds, suitable for large-scale analysis (Housman et al, 2018), and has been previously applied and well-justified for use in glacial environments (Scherler et al, 2018). A 20 % threshold is applied to every image, thereby excluding any pixel with a cloud score >20 % from the image.…”
Section: Cloud Maskingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dual Landsat 5/7 constellation increases tool area accuracy further to 69 %. However, a decrease in mean area accuracy is evident after the failure of the Landsat 7 Scan Line Corrector in May 2003 (Markham et al, 2004), decreasing tool areal accuracy by 4 %, due to images missing up to 20 %-25 % of their data per image in the stack (Hossain et al, 2015). We find that a number of Landsat 7 scenes also feature stripes of no data, pre-dating the scan line corrector failure, and can inaccurately cause "stripes" of new debris in tool outputs.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the scan line corrector (SLC) in the enhanced thematic mapper plus (ETM+) instrument of Landsat-7 failed on May 31, 2003, approximately 22% of the data in the Landsat-7 scene were missing. 39) Therefore, some strips in the Landsat-7 image, part of the original data, are missing. To effectively evaluate the data detection results, we applied mask processing to the hyperspectral data to make it consistent with the Landsat-7 data, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Description Of the Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper left-hand corner of this area is 120°45′12′′ E, 41°39′7′′ N, and its bottom right-hand corner is 121°13′9′′ E, 39°44′42′′ N. The validation data consisted of Landsat-7 (with a spatial resolution of 15 m) sea ice data from the same location acquired on 26 January 2008. Because the scan line corrector (SLC) in the enhanced thematic mapper plus (ETM+) instrument of Landsat-7 failed on 31 May 2003, approximately 22% of the data in the Landsat-7 scene were missing [ 28 ]. Therefore, some strips in the Landsat-7 image, part of the original data, are missing data, as shown in Figure 8 b.…”
Section: Experimental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%