2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1464-1909(01)00051-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of land use and climate change impacts on the mesoscale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
43
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
12
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These relatively small impacts on urban runoff can be explained by the rural structure of the basin, in which doubling of the urban area results in only 5% urban land use. However, similar results were obtained in catchments with somewhat larger percentages of urban areas, for instance, by Fohrer et al (2001), Lahmer et al (2001), Klöcking and Haberlandt (2002) and Niehoff et al (2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These relatively small impacts on urban runoff can be explained by the rural structure of the basin, in which doubling of the urban area results in only 5% urban land use. However, similar results were obtained in catchments with somewhat larger percentages of urban areas, for instance, by Fohrer et al (2001), Lahmer et al (2001), Klöcking and Haberlandt (2002) and Niehoff et al (2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Fohrer et al (2001) applied the physically-based hydrological model SWAT mod to a meso-scale catchment to assess the effect of land-use changes on annual water balances and on temporal runoff dynamics and showed that surface runoff was most susceptible to land-use changes. Two applications of land-use change using the ArcEGMO model (Lahmer et al, 2001;Klöcking and Haberlandt, 2002) to meso-and macro-scale catchments demonstrated relatively minor effects on various water balance components but larger effects on water availability. In a semi-humid meso-scale catchment in eastern Germany, Wegehenkel (2002) assessed the impact of afforestation on the water balance using the conceptual hydrological model THESEUS and found a significant reduction in discharge and an increase in evapotranspiration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was shown that the differences in the soil characteristics under these different land covers was more important than the vegetation characteristics. This contradicts the conclusions of Lahmer et al, (2001) who found that arable reversion had only a small impact on runoff, but influenced evapotranspiration and interception more. Bormann et al, (2007) highlighted the uncertainty over the effects of land cover conversion.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…However the effects are difficult to predict (Burt and Slattery, 1996) due to the various variables involved and how changes in one balance effect another. Lahmer et al, (2001) states that arable reversion has only a small impact on surface runoff, but affects other processes, such as evapotranspiration and interception more, while Fohrer et al, (2001) believes runoff is most susceptible to changes due to land management. Naef et al, (2002) proposed three approaches to delay runoff which are; improved tillage, plant species with high root densities and permanent surface cover.…”
Section: Arable Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation