Assessment of Interpersonal Motivation in Transcripts (AIMIT): an Inter‐ and Intra‐rater Reliability Study of a New Method of Detection of Interpersonal Motivational Systems in Psychotherapy

Abstract

Assessing Interpersonal Motivations in Transcripts (AIMIT) is a coding system aiming to systematically detect the activity of interpersonal motivational systems (IMS) in the therapeutic dialogue. An inter- and intra-rater reliability study has been conducted. Sixteen video-recorded psychotherapy sessions were selected and transcribed according to the AIMIT criteria. Sessions relate to 16 patients with an Axis II diagnosis, with a mean Global Assessment of Functioning of 51. For the intra-rater reliability evaluation, five sessions have been selected and assigned to five independent coders who where asked to make a first evaluation, and then a second independent one 14 days later. For the inter-rater reliability study, the sessions coded by the therapist-coder were jointly revised with another coder and finally classified as gold standard. The 16 standard sessions were sent to other evaluators for the independent coding. The agreement (κ) was estimated according to the following parameters for each coding unit: evaluation units supported by the 'codable' activation of one or more IMS; motivational interaction with reference to the ongoing relation between patient and therapist; an interaction between the patient and another person reported/narrated by the patient; detection of specific IMS: attachment (At), caregiving (CG), rank (Ra), sexuality (Se), peer cooperation (PC); and transitions from one IMS to another were also scored. The intra-rater agreement was evaluated through the parameters 'cod', 'At', 'CG', 'Ra', 'Se' and 'PC' described above. A total of 2443 coding units were analysed. For the nine parameters on which the agreement was calculated, eight ['coded (Cod)', 'ongoing relation (Rel)', 'narrated relation (Nar)', 'At', 'CG', 'Ra', 'Se' and 'PC'] have κ values comprised between 0.62 (CG) and 0.81 (Cod) and were therefore satisfactory. The scoring of 'transitions' showed agreement values slightly below desired cut-off (0.56). Intra-rater reliability was very good (κ values for Cod = 0.90; κ for all IMS = 0.78). Data seem to support the validity of the AIMIT method in terms of reliability, and encourage to further implementation of the AIMIT approach.

Unresolved attachment and agency in women victims of intimate partner violence: A case–control study

“…The therapist, far from being frightened by the patient's fear (see Main & Hesse, ), will build an alliance based on trust and sharing (Fassone et al ., ; Liotti & Gilbert, ; Prunetti, Bosio, Bateni, & Liotti, ). In this way, he will represent a secure base for patients that will make it possible to delve into the abuse experiences (George & Buchheim, ) and to bring to the light memories and feelings segregated from consciousness (West & George, ).…”

INvolvement of breast CAncer patients during oncological consultations: a multicentre randomised controlled trial—the INCA study protocol

“…The questions that emerge during the consultations are compared with those expressed before the visit. The audiorecorded consultations are also analysed in terms of patient-centredness with the VR-COPE 25 and with the Assessment of Interpersonal Motivation in Transcripts (AIMIT) 26 which evaluates the five different motivational systems that guide the verbal and non-verbal behaviours during interactions.…”

An exploratory assessment of theory of mind and psychological impairment in patients with bulimia nervosa

“…The understanding of mind is one of the most important attainments in childhood, which allows children to function socially and to distinguish accidental and intended behaviour, wishes and reality, truth and deception. Over the past two decades, a large amount of research has highlighted the fact that mindreading abilities underpin particular aspects of people's social functioning (Astington, 2003;Fassone et al, 2012;Lonigro, Laghi, Baiocco, & Baumgartner, 2013). Many researchers claimed that the understanding of mind could have a greater weight on social behaviour (Mull & Evans, 2010;Tchanturia et al, 2004) and that it is fundamental for the understanding of the social world and the engagement in human interactions (H€ unefeldt, Laghi, & Ortu, 2013;Mull & Evans, 2010).…”

“…Many researchers claimed that the understanding of mind could have a greater weight on social behaviour (Mull & Evans, 2010;Tchanturia et al, 2004) and that it is fundamental for the understanding of the social world and the engagement in human interactions (H€ unefeldt, Laghi, & Ortu, 2013;Mull & Evans, 2010). Over the past two decades, a large amount of research has highlighted the fact that mindreading abilities underpin particular aspects of people's social functioning (Astington, 2003;Fassone et al, 2012;Lonigro, Laghi, Baiocco, & Baumgartner, 2013).…”