1996
DOI: 10.1300/j020v14n01_07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Internalized Shame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results concerning the ISS_SE factor structure also revealed a one-dimensional structure, which is in accordance with existing studies on the dimensionality of this ISS scale (del Rosario & White, 2006;Rybak & Brown, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Results concerning the ISS_SE factor structure also revealed a one-dimensional structure, which is in accordance with existing studies on the dimensionality of this ISS scale (del Rosario & White, 2006;Rybak & Brown, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly, Del Rosario and White (2006) established that the two subscales revealed high internal consistency coefficients (.95 for Internal Shame, and .89 for Self-Esteem). Furthermore, Rybak and Brown (1996), concluded that the ISS presents high construct validity, given the association between the Internal Shame subscale of the ISS and other affect constructs theoretically connected to shame, such as anxiety, hostility, depression and positive affect.…”
Section: According To the Iss Technical Manualmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cook (1987) developed the Internalized Shame Scale (ISS) based on Tomkins' theory. Rybak and Brown's (1996) research suggested that the ISS is a valid and reliable measure of shame.…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%