Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1177/1555343415613723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Innovative Emergency Department Information Displays in a Clinical Simulation Center

Abstract: The objective of this work was to assess the functional utility of new display concepts for an emergency department information system created using cognitive systems engineering methods, by comparing them to similar displays currently in use. The display concepts were compared to standard displays in a clinical simulation study during which nurse-physician teams performed simulated emergency department tasks. Questionnaires were used to assess the cognitive support provided by the displays, participants' leve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, as part of our larger research project, we collected additional measures regarding use of these displays, in separate studies. In particular, as reported in McGeorge et al (2015), we compared these displays to control displays which mimicked current systems being used by participants in a dynamic experimental task performed by two-person participant teams (a physician and nurse) in a clinical simulation environment (McGeorge et al, 2015). Objective measures of situation awareness (collected through the SAGAT technique) along with subjective workload measures and rating of cognitive support were collected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, as part of our larger research project, we collected additional measures regarding use of these displays, in separate studies. In particular, as reported in McGeorge et al (2015), we compared these displays to control displays which mimicked current systems being used by participants in a dynamic experimental task performed by two-person participant teams (a physician and nurse) in a clinical simulation environment (McGeorge et al, 2015). Objective measures of situation awareness (collected through the SAGAT technique) along with subjective workload measures and rating of cognitive support were collected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One strength was that this study was done with participants who are experts and familiar in the management of perioperative settings. Developing a new information system to support daily unit operation should be done together with those who are the possible users (Gutenstein et al, ; McGeorge et al, ). Therefore, the participants were familiar with the topic and the content of the survey was not sensitive.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies concerning information processes suggest focusing more on knowledge management and knowledge use studies in addition to focusing on data science. It is recommended that research is done together with end‐users (Gutenstein et al, ; McGeorge et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Previous work of this research team used methods from cognitive systems engineering to design a suite of patient tracking and ED management-related displays and evaluated those displays in laboratory and clinical simulation settings. [22][23][24] There has not, however, been a focus on designing an integrated, patient-focused view that helps clinicians on the ED care team develop, communicate about, and maintain awareness regarding a patient's health status and progress through the plan of care.…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%