2010
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1266851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of infrapubic arc angle using 3D perineal ultrasound and relation to obstetric parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilizing the same 3D ultrasound technology but with a different method of measurement on a different cohort of patients, S.B.A. recently found a mean SPAA of 99.71° ± 10.89° for one examiner and 101.4° ± 10.33° for another. The mean pubic arch angle published by Gilboa et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Utilizing the same 3D ultrasound technology but with a different method of measurement on a different cohort of patients, S.B.A. recently found a mean SPAA of 99.71° ± 10.89° for one examiner and 101.4° ± 10.33° for another. The mean pubic arch angle published by Gilboa et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups have studied the angle created by the inferior rami of the pubic bone, and have given it different terms. As our method to measure this angle was based on that described by Choi et al , we decided to use their term ‘subpubic arch angle’ with the abbreviation of SPAA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the SPA measurement proved to be an independent predictor of the mode of delivery and duration of labor. In the last few years, sonographic measurement of the SPA has been heralded as a reliable and simple index of maternal pelvimetry [13]. Initial reports have shown higher risks of caesarean section in patients with small SPA values measured during labor [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classic pelvimetry based upon clinical or radiological examination has been abandoned due to its low accuracy, reproducibility, and costeffectiveness [3]. Very recently, the use of ultrasound has proved to be reliable in assessing the subpubic arch angle (SPA) [11,12], whose size is related to the transverse diameter of the birth canal [13]. Some independent studies have shown that, in the general population, a narrow SPA at antepartum ultrasound is associated with prolonged labor [14][15][16] and an increased risk of obstetric intervention [17,18].…”
Section: Correlation Between Subpubic Arch Angle and Mode Of Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound enables us to identify and evaluate the interpubic gap and the infrapubic arc with a high interrater agreement. It has been shown that infrapubic angle is not associated with length of second stage of labor and the occurrence of levator ani defects (24). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%