2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of infant feeding styles among low-income African-American mothers: Comparing reported and observed behaviors

Abstract: This study's goal was to provide a detailed description of feeding styles adopted by a sample of African-American women in feeding their infants in North Carolina, and to examine the correspondence between reported and observed feeding styles. Cross-sectional semi-structured interview and videotaped data were gathered in the homes of 20 participating low-income mothers of infants aged 3-20 months. Feeding styles were characterized through a tailored coding scheme (the Infant Feeding Styles Video Coding Scheme,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike previous studies (Dennis, 2002;Fein et al, 2008;Sacco et al, 2007;Taveras et al, 2004), our sample included a fairly homogeneous group of mothers: young, first-time, and predominantly lowincome. Most of our study participants were African-American, single or dating, and had public health insurance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike previous studies (Dennis, 2002;Fein et al, 2008;Sacco et al, 2007;Taveras et al, 2004), our sample included a fairly homogeneous group of mothers: young, first-time, and predominantly lowincome. Most of our study participants were African-American, single or dating, and had public health insurance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding how maternal beliefs influence the implementation of complementary feeding (i.e., starting solid foods, transitioning to table food) in infants less than 1 year of age remains unclear. The few studies that have examined this phenomenon are limited by small samples and fail to identify personal maternal factors that may influence infant feeding practices (Bentley, Gavin, Black, & Teti, 1999;Sacco, Bentley, Carby-Shields, Borja, & Goldman, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies of Farrow et al (16) and Haycraft and Blissett (18) used the Family Mealtime Coding System to code the observed maternal pressure to eat (using verbal or physical prompts) and restriction (verbally disallowing or limiting food or physically moving food out of reach) as well as maternal selfreported practices by using Child Feeding Questionnaire's (CFQ) pressure to eat and restriction subscales (35). (30,35,36) to measure verbal and physical controlling feeding practices. Observed behaviors were classified under 4 categories as follows: verbal restriction, physical restriction, verbal pressure, and physical pressure.…”
Section: Maternal Feeding Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of parenting and feeding in the public health context requires the use of self-report questionnaires which raises the potential for acquiescence bias. The alternative approach of observing parent-child feeding interactions generally shows poor agreement with self-reported feeding practices (Klesges et al, 1983;Klesges, Malott, Boschee, & Weber, 1986;Sacco, Bentley, Carby-Shields, Borja, & Goldman, 2007). However, observational methods capture a snapshot of the feeding interaction during a single meal and may not accurately assess typical parent-child (feeding) interactions, while self-report questionnaires aim to assess ongoing, steady-state feeding interactions (Faith, Scanlon, Birch, Francis, & Sherry, 2004).…”
Section: Limitations Of Research To Datementioning
confidence: 99%