2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/educon.2016.7474537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of individual students in group work in engineering programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can also do automatic statistics for a more precision evaluation, however, due to the number of features implemented, most of them are unlikely to be used. Other tool is WebPA [6], that can be flexible by allowing teachers to make their questions. It is possible to make the assessment with no restrictions; therefore, the students are able to evaluate all their peers with the same mark.…”
Section: Consider the Dropout Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also do automatic statistics for a more precision evaluation, however, due to the number of features implemented, most of them are unlikely to be used. Other tool is WebPA [6], that can be flexible by allowing teachers to make their questions. It is possible to make the assessment with no restrictions; therefore, the students are able to evaluate all their peers with the same mark.…”
Section: Consider the Dropout Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%