2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-008-1872-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Improved Organ at Risk Sparing for Advanced Cervix Carcinoma Utilizing Precision Radiotherapy Techniques

Abstract: Proton beam RT has significant potential to improve treatment related side effects in the bowel compared to photon beam RT in patients with advanced cervix carcinoma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One patient suffered delayed wound healing. Four patients (7%) reported some form of fecal incontinence, 6 patients complained about perianal pain, 1 patient about erectile dysfunction, and 3 patients had chronic diarrhea [5,7,8].…”
Section: Toxicity Of Radiation and Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One patient suffered delayed wound healing. Four patients (7%) reported some form of fecal incontinence, 6 patients complained about perianal pain, 1 patient about erectile dysfunction, and 3 patients had chronic diarrhea [5,7,8].…”
Section: Toxicity Of Radiation and Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiation treatment consisted of five weekly fractions at 1.8 Gy for a total dose of 50.4 Gy (a total of 28 fractions) were given to the pelvic lymph nodes and former tumor region with a 7-field IMRT plan generated in order to decrease the dose to the small bowel [5]. A boost was given to the clipmarked region +3 mm margins with five weekly fractions of 1.8 Gy to a total of 16.2 Gy with a stereotactic technique [21].…”
Section: Chemoradiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is driven by inverse planning approaches and computerized optimization modules which require certain input data [2,5,10,12,13,18,19,29,30,34,35]. Parotid gland sparing is one main motivation for IMRT in the head-and-neck region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%