Assessment of implant stability by resonant frequency analysis

Konstantinović, Vitomir S.; Ivanjac, Filip; Lazić, Vesna; Djordjević, Igor

doi:10.2298/vsp130801063k

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Resonance frequency analysis is used to measure implant stability more reliably, and can be conducted at any stage (Konstantinović et al, 2015). Meredith et al (1997) led the implant measurement using RFA method by developing a device called as Ostell® (1997).…”

Section: Resonance Frequency Analysis (Rfa) Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dental Implant Monitoring Using Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Measurement

Genisa¹,

Shuib²,

Rajion³

et al. 2020

IJTech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental implants commonly practiced replacing edentulous teeth. However, it is still challenging to evaluate the progress of osseointegration during the healing process after implant placement. This study aims to measure the implant stability of pre-and post-crown placement to monitor osseointegration during the healing process and correlate it with the bone quality and quantity and other parameters. Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) method as a standard method has been used to monitor implant stability. Ten patients from Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia have been involved with and treated by immediate implant placement procedures on their mandibular jaw system. Monitoring was also conducted by measuring the density of bone estimated based on Cone Beam Computed Tomography data. On the basis of the study, RFA and density monitoring show that there are at least three classes of patients: Class 1 are the patients who have a significant increment of implant stability; Class 2 are the patients with constant implant stability; and Class 3 are the patients who have negative implant stability progress, or their implant stability was decreasing. On the basis of the result, monitoring of implant stability by measuring the density is still challenging, the correlation between secondary implant stability and density is not significant statistically. It is recommended in future research to evaluate the implant stability by involving more patients from different races and also correlating the implant stability with the dynamic properties such as stress distribution.

show abstract

Section: Resonance Frequency Analysis (Rfa) Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dental Implant Monitoring Using Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Measurement

Genisa¹,

Shuib²,

Rajion³

et al. 2020

IJTech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Majority of them have undergone previous tumor resections, which could cause the lack of the bone needed for implant placement. Good implant stability is important for stable maxillofacial prosthesis anchorage [1,2]. One of the most important factors for successful implant therapy is the bone quality and quantity [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For craniofacial implant stabilization, microarchitectural parameters of cortical bone in the targeted implant placement points are particularly important. [2,3]. Periorbital, perinasal and periauricular region which are used for implant anchorage, have different bone microstructure, which could affect the final outcome of the implant therapy [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Microcomputed tomography cortical bone evaluation for craniofacial implantology

Ivanjac

Konstantinović

2020

Srp Arh Celok Lek

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction/Objective. Good implant stability is one of the most important factors for successful implant therapy. This precondition is important to all kind of implants, oral and extra-oral (EO) ie. Craniofacial implants as well. One of the most important factors for satisfactory implant stability is the bone quality, particularly of the cortical bone, which is determined by its microarchitectural parameters. The aim of this paper was to assess cortical bone microarchitectural parameters in the targeted regions for craniofacial implant placement. Methods. Bone quality on targeted localisations was determined by Micro CT method on cadaver model. The target places for implant placement were: periorbital, perinasal and periauricular region. Microarchitectural parameters included cortical thickness (Ct.Th), cortical porosity (Ct.Po), pore diameter (Po.Dm) and pore separation (Po.Sp). Results. The smallest cortical porosity, (Ct.Po. 4.1 %) and the largest pore separation (Po.Sp. 0.5 mm), were determined in glabella. The maximum cortical thickness was found in the zygomatic region (Ct.Th. 2.7 mm) as well as pore diameter (Po.Dm. 0.2 mm). The mastoid part of the temporal bone showed the smallest cortical thickness (Ct.Th.1.2 mm) and pore separation (Po.Sp. 0.3 mm). Highest cortical porosity was in the perinasal region (Ct.Po. 8.5%). Conclusion. The bone quality measured through microarchitectural parameters was good in all the regions of interest for the disk and screw shape EO implant anchorage. [Project of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Grant no. 41008]

show abstract

“…8 Implant stability measuring using resonant frequency analysis (RFA) is a modern, non-invasive and a relatively precise technique, which provides both information on implant stability in the bone and a reliable guidance to further course of implant therapy. 9 The use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has led to a complete paradigm shift in implant dentistry -no other technology has been as influential in combining surgery, diagnostics and prosthetics. 10 CBCT technology allowed preoperative interactive diagnosis of the prospective implant sites as well as objective assessment of the peri-implant bone quantity and quality.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Implant Stability and Marginal Bone Loss in Mandibular Implant Retained Overdenture Cases: A Comparative Study Using Two Stud Attachment Systems

Araby

Agamy

2016

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Whilst the majority of patients is reasonably happy with a well made upper complete denture, many are not as satisfied with a lower complete denture. Patients frequently complain of looseness and social embarrassment due to movement of the prosthesis during function. Implant-retained overdentures are a highly useful treatment modality for many of those patients. 1 According to McGill Consensus Statement on overdentures and more recently in the York Consensus Statement; mandibular two-implant

show abstract

Assessment of implant stability by resonant frequency analysis

Abstract: nema

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Dental Implant Monitoring Using Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Measurement

Dental Implant Monitoring Using Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Measurement

Microcomputed tomography cortical bone evaluation for craniofacial implantology

Implant Stability and Marginal Bone Loss in Mandibular Implant Retained Overdenture Cases: A Comparative Study Using Two Stud Attachment Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About