2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.03.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of hypervapotron heat sink performance using CFD under DEMO relevant first wall conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work the performance of the wellknown Hypervapotron (HV) heat sink for a FW limiter application under DEMO operating conditions is predicted using CFD. In order to assess the performance, numerical simulations are performed using a commercial computational fluid dynamics code which was previously validated in predicting the thermal hydraulic performance of HV geometry [42]. Based on the results the potential usage of HV heat sink for DEMO reactor will be assessed.…”
Section: Blanket Fw and Limitersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work the performance of the wellknown Hypervapotron (HV) heat sink for a FW limiter application under DEMO operating conditions is predicted using CFD. In order to assess the performance, numerical simulations are performed using a commercial computational fluid dynamics code which was previously validated in predicting the thermal hydraulic performance of HV geometry [42]. Based on the results the potential usage of HV heat sink for DEMO reactor will be assessed.…”
Section: Blanket Fw and Limitersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may prove to be an appropriate level for a uniform, normal scenario load; but peaked loads due to magnetic field ripple, plasma transients, wall dimensional intolerance, etc, could be an order of magnitude higher. Baseline FW concepts are based on helium and water cooling of EUROFER channels [10][11][12][13][14], which are reported to have heat flux limits of about 1 MW/m 2 and 1.5 MW/m 2 , respectively. Importantly, these limits are based on engineering analyses however they neither account for irradiated material properties nor the presence of the tungsten armour.…”
Section: Fw Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FW topology and cooling channel technology [12,13] are currently an active design task and a function of the architecture as per Table 1. As in the divertor, the proposed FW armour material is tungsten, although it is expected that the thickness can be less; nominally 2mm is assumed to be sufficient although this will vary with position around the wall.…”
Section: Fw Pfcsmentioning
confidence: 99%