2018
DOI: 10.3390/w10050588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Historical Flood Risk to the Groundwater Regime: Case Study of the Kolubara Coal Basin, Serbia

Abstract: Heavy rainfall and slow movement of the cyclone Tamara caused record floods in May 2014 across Serbia. As a result, levees were breached, a large portion of the open-pit lignite mine Tamnava-West Field was flooded and a flood lake was created. Due to an active hydraulic link with aquifers, the water table rose and the amount of stored groundwater increased dramatically. Based on in situ surveys and hydrodynamic modeling, three distinct periods of the groundwater regime are identified and the flood impact on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early studies on disaster risk assessment methods mainly focused on qualitative assessment methods, but due to the uncertainty of disaster assessment, the qualitative assessment could not meet the research needs; thus research gradually moved from qualitative methods to a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, or fully quantitative methods [17][18][19][20]. At present, risk assessments are based on four main methods: (1) Mathematical statistics, a method usually used to calculate the intensity and frequency of disaster occurrence from historical disaster data and loss data [21,22]; (2) an indicators system, which usually selects reasonable disaster indicators and determines the weight of each indicator to build a risk assessment model and then conduct a comprehensive risk assessment [8,[23][24][25][26]; (3) RS-GIS technique, in which the satellite remote sensing data are processed and analyzed to determine the flood area and disaster high-risk area with the help of GIS technology [27,28]; and (4) scenario simulation, a method that conducts hydrological and hydrodynamic models to simulate flood scenarios [29][30][31]. Lots of studies show that the second disaster risk assessment method can reflect the regional risk situation on a macro level, and it has been widely applied because it is simple to conduct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies on disaster risk assessment methods mainly focused on qualitative assessment methods, but due to the uncertainty of disaster assessment, the qualitative assessment could not meet the research needs; thus research gradually moved from qualitative methods to a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, or fully quantitative methods [17][18][19][20]. At present, risk assessments are based on four main methods: (1) Mathematical statistics, a method usually used to calculate the intensity and frequency of disaster occurrence from historical disaster data and loss data [21,22]; (2) an indicators system, which usually selects reasonable disaster indicators and determines the weight of each indicator to build a risk assessment model and then conduct a comprehensive risk assessment [8,[23][24][25][26]; (3) RS-GIS technique, in which the satellite remote sensing data are processed and analyzed to determine the flood area and disaster high-risk area with the help of GIS technology [27,28]; and (4) scenario simulation, a method that conducts hydrological and hydrodynamic models to simulate flood scenarios [29][30][31]. Lots of studies show that the second disaster risk assessment method can reflect the regional risk situation on a macro level, and it has been widely applied because it is simple to conduct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…River flooding is strongly dependent upon complex catchment characteristics and land use patterns [9][10][11]. Indeed, the frequency and magnitude of river floods have changed in the past several decades in some regions, with impacts across human and natural systems [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Analyses of in situ streamflow measurements showed both increases and decreases in the frequency of river floods during 1960-2020 in Europe [24][25][26], as well decreases or variability in some areas in the Mediterranean [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical methods extract patterns based on a large amount of historical data. It can distinctly illustrate a hazard-affected region (Polomčić et al, 2018). The indicator methods evaluate the hazard based on the analysis of the diversity influence factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%