2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of heavy metal pollutants accumulation in the Tisza river sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
158
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 359 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(54 reference statements)
3
158
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The high percentage of lead in the acid soluble fraction indicates its recent origin possibly due to increasing vehicular traffic in the city (Adami et al, 2007). The dominance of lead in the acid soluble phase is also reported in the sediments of the Tisza River, Serbia (Sakan et al, 2009). Moreover, the high concentration of Pb in the acid soluble fraction in the sediments is in accordance with its special affinity for carbonates.…”
Section: Metal Fractionation In Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The high percentage of lead in the acid soluble fraction indicates its recent origin possibly due to increasing vehicular traffic in the city (Adami et al, 2007). The dominance of lead in the acid soluble phase is also reported in the sediments of the Tisza River, Serbia (Sakan et al, 2009). Moreover, the high concentration of Pb in the acid soluble fraction in the sediments is in accordance with its special affinity for carbonates.…”
Section: Metal Fractionation In Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Heavy metal level higher than twice the background implies anthropogenic pollution, while EF higher than 2 indicates contamination (4,(18)(19)(20). The enrichment of heavy metals in sediment is mainly due to surface adsorption and ionic attraction (21).…”
Section: Distribution Of Heavy Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of data relating to the local trace metal background values, this study uses those reported for the continental shale [29]. Sakan et al [30] suggested that EF values <1 indicate no enrichment; <3 indicate minor enrichment; 3-5 indicate moderate enrichment; 5-10 indicate moderately severe enrichment; 10-25 indicate severe enrichment; 25-50 indicate very severe enrichment; and >50 indicate extremely severe enrichment. In order to get insights into possible inter-dependence between the hydrodynamic conditions (in terms of FT) and the trace metal EF values, a Pearson's correlation analysis was performed.…”
Section: Sediment Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%