2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-016-2560-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of heavy metal contamination status in sediments and identification of pollution source in Ichkeul Lake and rivers ecosystem, northern Tunisia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment of the potential eco-risk is performed using sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) and potential ecological risk indices (E r and RI) (Håkanson 1980;MacDonald et al 2000). Such factors as the establishment of aquatic sediment quality guidelines and development of different geochemical and ecotoxicological criteria have resulted in the evaluation of bottom sediment quality in many countries (e.g., Varol 2011;Selvam et al 2012;Wang et al 2012;Zhang et al 2014;Soliman et al 2015;Ouchir et al 2016;Aleksander-Kwaterczak and Plenzler 2019;El-Kady et al 2019). However, the SQGs do not reflect in situ conditions, as sediment chemistry is diversified and pollutants bioavailability depends on physiochemical properties of deposits and local conditions, which additionally may be easily altered during the sampling and operation processes.…”
Section: Responsible Editor: Tomas Matys Grygarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of the potential eco-risk is performed using sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) and potential ecological risk indices (E r and RI) (Håkanson 1980;MacDonald et al 2000). Such factors as the establishment of aquatic sediment quality guidelines and development of different geochemical and ecotoxicological criteria have resulted in the evaluation of bottom sediment quality in many countries (e.g., Varol 2011;Selvam et al 2012;Wang et al 2012;Zhang et al 2014;Soliman et al 2015;Ouchir et al 2016;Aleksander-Kwaterczak and Plenzler 2019;El-Kady et al 2019). However, the SQGs do not reflect in situ conditions, as sediment chemistry is diversified and pollutants bioavailability depends on physiochemical properties of deposits and local conditions, which additionally may be easily altered during the sampling and operation processes.…”
Section: Responsible Editor: Tomas Matys Grygarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, the significant Pb contamination in the Ichkeul Lagoon, in the tissue of the mullets and their acanthocephalan, was expected due to the presence of an old lead mine and a metallurgical company ‘Elfouledh’ near the lagoon. The latter is responsible for the release of large quantities of Pb and Cd, which considerably increased the pollution levels in the lagoon (water column, sediments) (Ouchir et al ., 2016). Regarding the rest of the metals, although their source remains unclear, their presence can be attributed mainly to urban inputs, the influx of agricultural products and the discharging of wastewater through wadis that flow into the lagoon (Ouchir et al ., 2016; Ben Salem et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we tried to evaluate the potential risk to human health since those two fish species are frequently taken for human consumption. This field survey was performed in one of the most important coastal lagoons in Tunisia (Ichkeul Lagoon), which is known to be impacted by combined pollution from natural and anthropogenic sources (Ben Mbarek, 2001; Ouchir et al ., 2016). Both the water and sediments in this lagoon contain high concentrations of heavy metals such as copper (Cu), iron (Fe), lead (Pb) and zinc (Zn) (Ouchir et al ., 2016; Yazidi et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the Igeo allow for an evaluation of the pollution intensity with heavy metals, according to Table 2. The contamination factor describes the pollution level of sediment with a given heavy metal and is calculated as the ratio between the concentration of each measured heavy metal (Cn) and its background value (C bn ) (Equation ( 2)) [39,40]…”
Section: Sample Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%