1989
DOI: 10.1159/000276028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Head Shaking Test in Neuro-Otological Practice

Abstract: The head shaking test (HST) is an important test in neuro-otological diagnosis. In our study of 277 patients complaining of dizziness we verified this importance. The results thus obtained were compared with the results recorded in 73 normal subjects. Head shaking nystagmus was observed in 73 patients. Of these 73 cases, 42 involved central diseases and 31 cases involved peripheral diseases. Head shaking nystagmus was observed in 7 subjects of the control group. A highly significant correlation was noted betwe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vestibular function was studied by evaluation of the spontaneous, positional, and head-shaking nystagmus [19], and by the caloric stimulation test following the procedure of Fitzgerald and Hallpike [20]. The normal range for each test was obtained by performing the same tests on normal subjects at our Institute.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vestibular function was studied by evaluation of the spontaneous, positional, and head-shaking nystagmus [19], and by the caloric stimulation test following the procedure of Fitzgerald and Hallpike [20]. The normal range for each test was obtained by performing the same tests on normal subjects at our Institute.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vestibular function was studied under electronystagmographic recording by evaluation of sponta neous, positional, cervical and head-shaking nystagmus [ 15], caloric stimulation using the Fitzgcrald-Hallpike method [ 16] and the visual suppression test [17]. The normal range for each test was obtained from audiological and vestibular laboratory results performed on normal subjects at the Institute of Otolaryngology of Pisa University.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the high prevalence of the target conditions in the included populations (6% for Ménière disease and 80% for vertigo) inflates the positive predictive values and decreases the negative predictive values. Furthermore, symptoms are probably Guidetti et al 32 Tseng et al 45 Harvey et al 34 Fujimoto et al 30 Goebel et al 31 Burgio et al 25 Jacobson et al 35 Vicini et al 46 Specificity ( Review more severe or pronounced in patients referred for secondary or tertiary care, which may inflate both the sensitivity and specificity. Although we used prevalence in a hypothetical primary care population to estimate likelihood ratios, we could not correct for this phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%