2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019ea000861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Ground‐Based X‐Band Radar Reflectivity: Attenuation Correction and its Comparison With Space‐Borne Radars Over the Western Ghats, India

Abstract: Reflectivity measurements from X-band ground-based radar (GR) are assessed using observations from the Ku-band space-borne radars (SRs) onboard the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission and Global Precipitation Measurement satellites as a reference. The GR is at Mandhardev (18.04ºN, 73.86ºE) in the Western Ghats region, and the evaluation period is from June to September of 2014 and 2018. At X-band, the rainfall-induced attenuation leads to significant signal loss. The rain attenuation correction of GR is perfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the maximum CS frequency is shifted ( 1 h) in the TRMM-PR measurements. The peak occurrence shift may be due to different sampling intervals ( 12 min volume scan of X-band radar and instantaneous scan of TRMM-PR), different horizontal resolutions, viewing aspects, propagation paths, resolution volume size, and sensitivity between X-band radar and TRMM-PR measurements 38 . Krishna et al 39 compared the diurnal cycle in rainfall measured from impact disdrometer and TRMM along WG’s windward side.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the maximum CS frequency is shifted ( 1 h) in the TRMM-PR measurements. The peak occurrence shift may be due to different sampling intervals ( 12 min volume scan of X-band radar and instantaneous scan of TRMM-PR), different horizontal resolutions, viewing aspects, propagation paths, resolution volume size, and sensitivity between X-band radar and TRMM-PR measurements 38 . Krishna et al 39 compared the diurnal cycle in rainfall measured from impact disdrometer and TRMM along WG’s windward side.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radar signals are processed using Enigma III + signal processor. Detailed technical specifications can be found in Das et al 38 , 55 . Routine calibrations are performed for transmitted power and frequency, pulse width, received power, gain, and dynamic range as per the standard procedures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though both the radars (GPM Ka-band and ground-based Ka-band radar) have nearly the same operating frequency, one to one matching between their measurements is quite difficult. This mismatching is due to differences in viewing aspects between space and earth observations, propagation paths, resolution volume size, measurement sensitivity, and time synchronization mismatch [31], [32]. The mean and standard deviation of CTH and storm top height from Ka-band radar and GPM are provided in Table II. To evaluate the CTH obtained from Ka-band radar in R3, the CTH distributions are compared with cloud profiling radar (CPR) at W-band (~94 GHz) on-board the National Aeronautics and Space Administration cloud observing satellite (CloudSat) (figure not shown).…”
Section: Distribution Of Cth and Ccsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumes a fixed shape parameter (𝜇) in the gamma distribution (Saleeby and Cotton, 2004), introducing errors in the precipitation estimation. The DSD is also used in correcting the rain attenuation for short-wavelength radars (e.g., Bringi and Chandrasekar, 2001;Das et al, 2020). DSD retrieval accuracy is often assessed using disdrometer measurements (Munchak and Tokay, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%