The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of glioma response to radiotherapy using 3D pulsed-continuous arterial spin labeling and 3D segmented volume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ASL has also been deployed extensively in neuro-oncology, both to aid diagnosis 177,178 and therapy monitoring, 179 and to assist pre-surgical planning. 180 Higher grade tumours tend to show higher perfusion and vascularity, and ASL is also able to help distinguish tumourous progression from contrast-enhancing mimics and radiation necrosis.…”
Section: Applications Of Aslmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASL has also been deployed extensively in neuro-oncology, both to aid diagnosis 177,178 and therapy monitoring, 179 and to assist pre-surgical planning. 180 Higher grade tumours tend to show higher perfusion and vascularity, and ASL is also able to help distinguish tumourous progression from contrast-enhancing mimics and radiation necrosis.…”
Section: Applications Of Aslmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… HC No Nudelman [ 56 ] 3T 27/27F (50 ± 8) Breast I–III RTx 2, DXR 11, CP,DTX, HTx 3 PASL CBF↑ 7–12% after 1 m vs CTx- and HC group; CBF↑ 35% in CTx + , CBF↑ 13% in CTx- both in precentral gyrus vs HC 26/26F (52 ± 9) Breast 0–II RTx 6, HTx 26/26F (48 ± 10) HC No Nudelman [ 57 ] 3T 24/24F (49 ± 8) Breast I–III RTx 2, DXR 11, CP, DTX, HTx PASL CBF↑ after 1 m and 12 m in CTx + vs T0 23/23F (59 ± 9) Breast 0–II HTx Petr [ 140 ] 3T 24/? (54 ± 14) GBM IV IMRTx 60 Gy, TMZ 75 mg/m2 pCASL CBF↓ 9.8% in GM after 3 and 6 m vs T0 Petr [ 9 ] 3T 44/20F (55 ± 13) GBM IV RTx 60 Gy, TMZ 75 mg/m2 pCASL CBF↓ 10–11% in GM after 3 and 6 m, proton and photon therapy comparable ↓ vs T0 16/5F (52 ± 16) Proton 60 Gy, TMZ 75 mg/m2 Wang [ 52 ] 3T 16/? (65 ± 9) LGG I–II RTx 36-63 Gy pCASL CBF↓ 7–18% after 2-4 m vs T0 19/?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASL did not show CBF changes in NABT at 3 months after SRS in brain metastases patients [ 42 ], and unclear findings of both increase and decrease were reported in patients diagnosed with high-grade (HGG) and low-grade gliomas (LGG), respectively [ 52 ]. A larger prospective study in glioblastoma patients was, however, in line with the majority of DSC results showing 10–11% CBF decrease 3 and 6 months after photon RCTx at both low and high-dose regions, with a comparable decrease seen in proton-therapy patients alone [ 9 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MRI presentations of PsP and RT are similar, yet these 2 lesion types exhibit distinct angiogenesis characteristics. 35 Dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced PWI reflects blood perfusion and tissue microvessel distributions. Although RT lesions exhibit characteristics consistent with immature vascular structures, dense neovasculature, and increased vascular endothelial growth factor expression, PsP lesions instead exhibit hypoperfusion resulting from vascular endothelial cell apoptosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%