2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03558-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of gingival thickness using digital file superimposition versus direct clinical measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
57
3
Order By: Relevance
“…After searching the reference lists of publications and other document resources at the college library, 14 additional studies were added to the list by hand search. After a duplication check, 1237 articles remained for an eligibility check, and 12 articles were included by applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria 21–24,26–33 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…After searching the reference lists of publications and other document resources at the college library, 14 additional studies were added to the list by hand search. After a duplication check, 1237 articles remained for an eligibility check, and 12 articles were included by applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria 21–24,26–33 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a duplication check, 1237 articles remained for an eligibility check, and 12 articles were included by applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. [21][22][23][24][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Very recently, superimposition of STL and DICOM files was shown to achieve excellent agreement with transgingival sounding with an endodontic spreader. 30…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%