2019
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐113)

Abstract: Maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 × DAS‐40278‐9 (five‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine five single events: MON 89034, 1507, MON 88017, 59122 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the 5 single maize events and 11 of their subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or their 11 subcombinations that could modify the original conclusions on their safety were identified. The molecular characterisation, comparat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
8
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The updated bioinformatic analysis for maize event MON 88017 confirms previous conclusions which did not reveal any DNA sequence that could provide sufficient length and identity which could facilitate horizontal gene transfer (HGT) by double homologous recombination confirming previous conclusions (EFSA GMO Panel, 2017b, ). Given the results of this analysis and that the recombinant DNA in maize MON 88017 does not confer selective advantages to microorganisms, the GMO Panel identified no safety concern linked to an unlikely but theoretically possible HGT.…”
Section: Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The updated bioinformatic analysis for maize event MON 88017 confirms previous conclusions which did not reveal any DNA sequence that could provide sufficient length and identity which could facilitate horizontal gene transfer (HGT) by double homologous recombination confirming previous conclusions (EFSA GMO Panel, 2017b, ). Given the results of this analysis and that the recombinant DNA in maize MON 88017 does not confer selective advantages to microorganisms, the GMO Panel identified no safety concern linked to an unlikely but theoretically possible HGT.…”
Section: Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…On 29 August 2018, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) received from the European Commission (EC) application EFSA-GMO-RX-014 for the renewal of the authorisation of maize MON 88017 (Unique Identifier MON-88Ø17-3), submitted by Monsanto (hereafter referred to as 'the applicant') according to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 Following receipt of application EFSA-GMO-RX-014, EFSA informed the Member States (MS) and made the summary of the application available to the public on the EFSA website. 2 EFSA checked the application for compliance with the relevant requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and Regulation (EU) No 503/2013 3 and, when needed, asked the applicant to supplement the initial application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The updated bioinformatics analyses of events MON 87427, MON 89034, MIR162 and NK603 do not reveal any new DNA sequence that could provide sufficient length and identity which could facilitate HGT by double homologous recombination, confirming the conclusions of previous Scientific Opinions (EFSA GMO Panel, ,b, ,b,c).…”
Section: Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Subcombinations assessed in parallel in the context of application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐113 (EFSA GMO Panel, ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applicant clarified that the 1507 maize sequence reported for the four‐event stack maize contained one silent nucleotide change in the insert sequence compared to the corrected original 1507 maize sequence (EFSA GMO Panel, ,b, ). Analysis of the new sequencing data and bioinformatic analyses performed on the new sequence does not identify any need for further safety assessment.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%