The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 for food and feed uses, under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2018‐151)

Abstract: Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 was developed by crossing to combine five single events: MON 89034, 1507, MIR162, NK603 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the five single maize events and 16 of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the assessed subcombinations were identified that could lead to the modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
6
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The updated bioinformatic analyses for maize events DP4114, MON 89034, MON 87411 and DAS‐40278‐9 confirm the assessments provided in the context of previous Scientific Opinions (EFSA GMO Panel, 2021b, 2022a,b).…”
Section: Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The updated bioinformatic analyses for maize events DP4114, MON 89034, MON 87411 and DAS‐40278‐9 confirm the assessments provided in the context of previous Scientific Opinions (EFSA GMO Panel, 2021b, 2022a,b).…”
Section: Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The assessment of the Cry1F, Cry1A.105, Cry35Ab1, Cry3Bb1, PAT and PMI proteins revealed partial matches containing the Q/E‐X1‐P‐X2 motif and required further investigations. Several of these partial matches have been previously assessed by the EFSA GMO Panel (2019f, 2021b,d, 2022a,b). Based on additional considerations on the position and nature of amino acids flanking the motifs, such as the presence of two consecutive prolines and the charge and size of adjacent amino acids (EFSA GMO Panel, 2017), the relevant peptides containing the motif do not raise concern as they fail to mimic gluten sequences.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the specific combination of the genetic regions leading to this effect has not been adequately identified and characterised. Syngenta also pointed out that as part of the sequencing and bioinformatics analysis assessed by the GMO panel, the molecular characterisation of the MIR162 insertion was not shown to interrupt any known endogenous gene (EFSA GMO Panel, 2022a , b ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the scientific opinions in Table 1 were adopted recently. The opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2018‐151 for the five‐event stack maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations was adopted on 4 July 2022 (EFSA GMO Panel, 2022a ). The opinion on application EFSA‐RX‐GMO‐RX025 for the renewal of maize MIR162 was adopted on 1 September 2022 (EFSA GMO Panel, 2022b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation