Abstract:Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 was developed by crossing to combine five single events: MON 89034, 1507, MIR162, NK603 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the five single maize events and 16 of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the assessed subcombinations were identified that could lead to the modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comp… Show more
“…The updated bioinformatic analyses for maize events DP4114, MON 89034, MON 87411 and DAS‐40278‐9 confirm the assessments provided in the context of previous Scientific Opinions (EFSA GMO Panel, 2021b, 2022a,b).…”
Section: Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The assessment of the Cry1F, Cry1A.105, Cry35Ab1, Cry3Bb1, PAT and PMI proteins revealed partial matches containing the Q/E‐X1‐P‐X2 motif and required further investigations. Several of these partial matches have been previously assessed by the EFSA GMO Panel (2019f, 2021b,d, 2022a,b). Based on additional considerations on the position and nature of amino acids flanking the motifs, such as the presence of two consecutive prolines and the charge and size of adjacent amino acids (EFSA GMO Panel, 2017), the relevant peptides containing the motif do not raise concern as they fail to mimic gluten sequences.…”
Genetically modified maize DP4114 × MON 89034 × MON 87411 × DAS‐40278‐9 was developed by crossing to combine four single events: DP4114, MON 89034, MON 87411 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single maize events and two of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the assessed subcombinations were identified that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the four‐event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. Therefore, no post‐market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable four‐event stack maize grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in eight of the maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the four‐event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize DP4114 × MON 89034 × MON 87411 × DAS‐40278‐9. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM maize varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
“…The updated bioinformatic analyses for maize events DP4114, MON 89034, MON 87411 and DAS‐40278‐9 confirm the assessments provided in the context of previous Scientific Opinions (EFSA GMO Panel, 2021b, 2022a,b).…”
Section: Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The assessment of the Cry1F, Cry1A.105, Cry35Ab1, Cry3Bb1, PAT and PMI proteins revealed partial matches containing the Q/E‐X1‐P‐X2 motif and required further investigations. Several of these partial matches have been previously assessed by the EFSA GMO Panel (2019f, 2021b,d, 2022a,b). Based on additional considerations on the position and nature of amino acids flanking the motifs, such as the presence of two consecutive prolines and the charge and size of adjacent amino acids (EFSA GMO Panel, 2017), the relevant peptides containing the motif do not raise concern as they fail to mimic gluten sequences.…”
Genetically modified maize DP4114 × MON 89034 × MON 87411 × DAS‐40278‐9 was developed by crossing to combine four single events: DP4114, MON 89034, MON 87411 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single maize events and two of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the assessed subcombinations were identified that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the four‐event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. Therefore, no post‐market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable four‐event stack maize grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in eight of the maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the four‐event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize DP4114 × MON 89034 × MON 87411 × DAS‐40278‐9. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM maize varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
“…However, the specific combination of the genetic regions leading to this effect has not been adequately identified and characterised. Syngenta also pointed out that as part of the sequencing and bioinformatics analysis assessed by the GMO panel, the molecular characterisation of the MIR162 insertion was not shown to interrupt any known endogenous gene (EFSA GMO Panel, 2022a , b ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the scientific opinions in Table 1 were adopted recently. The opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2018‐151 for the five‐event stack maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations was adopted on 4 July 2022 (EFSA GMO Panel, 2022a ). The opinion on application EFSA‐RX‐GMO‐RX025 for the renewal of maize MIR162 was adopted on 1 September 2022 (EFSA GMO Panel, 2022b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, 1 the public was requested to comment on the scientific opinions after they were published. On 21 September 2022, the European Commission (EC) asked EFSA to assess whether the scientific comments received for the five‐event stack maize contain new information that might change the conclusions of EFSA GMO Panel ( 2022a ) (‘ request 1 ’). 2 On 10 November 2022, the EC asked EFSA to assess whether the scientific comments received for the renewal application contain new information that might change the conclusions of EFSA GMO Panel ( 2022b ) (‘ request 2 ’).…”
The European Commission requested the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA GMO Panel) to assess new scientific information on maize MIR162, and to indicate whether the previous conclusions on the safety of maize MIR162 as a single event and as a part of stacked events remain valid. The new information is included in a European patent that reports a decrease in male fertility in some MIR162 inbred lines, pointing to a potential link between such decrease and the Vip3 protein expressed by maize MIR162. The EFSA GMO Panel evaluated the data provided by the patent owner and found scarce support for a causal link between Vip3 and decreased fertility. The general hypothesis of an association between event MIR162 and altered fertility could not be confirmed. The EFSA GMO Panel conducted the safety assessment based on the conservative assumption that such an association exists. The EFSA GMO Panel concluded that a decrease in male fertility would have no impact on the previous conclusions on maize MIR162 and stacked events containing MIR162.
Genetically modified maize Bt11 9 MIR162 9 MIR604 9 MON 89034 9 5307 9 GA21 was developed by crossing to combine six single events: Bt11, MIR162, MIR604, MON 89034, 5307 and GA21, the GMO Panel previously assessed the 6 single maize events and 27 out of the 56 possible subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the assessed subcombinations were identified that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the six-event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that six-event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as the conventional counterpart and non-GM maize varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable six-event stack maize grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in 29 of the maize subcombinations not previously assessed and covered by the scope of this application and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the six-event stack maize. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize Bt11 9 MIR162 9 MIR604 9 MON 89034 9 5307 9 GA21. The GMO Panel concludes that six-event stack maize and the 30 subcombinations covered by the scope of the application are as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non-GM maize varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.