2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of genetic stability amongst micropropagated Ansellia africana, a vulnerable medicinal orchid species of Africa using SCoT markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another problem found in plant tissue culture involves the genetic stability of the plants. Different cases of micropropagation of in vitro-regenerated plants have shown that they are not always clonal copies of the mother plant (Devi et al 2014;Bhattacharyya et al 2017a). In vitro culture conditions, especially some growth regulators and elicitors, act as stress factors that induce alterations in sensitive regions of plant genome, and therefore, generate instability in cultured cells, tissues and organs, an occurrence known as somaclonal variation (Larkin and Scowcroft 1981;Gyulai et al 2003;Bairu et al 2011;Stanišic et al 2015;Govindaraju and Arulselvi 2016).…”
Section: Improvements In Traditional Culturing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another problem found in plant tissue culture involves the genetic stability of the plants. Different cases of micropropagation of in vitro-regenerated plants have shown that they are not always clonal copies of the mother plant (Devi et al 2014;Bhattacharyya et al 2017a). In vitro culture conditions, especially some growth regulators and elicitors, act as stress factors that induce alterations in sensitive regions of plant genome, and therefore, generate instability in cultured cells, tissues and organs, an occurrence known as somaclonal variation (Larkin and Scowcroft 1981;Gyulai et al 2003;Bairu et al 2011;Stanišic et al 2015;Govindaraju and Arulselvi 2016).…”
Section: Improvements In Traditional Culturing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to screen somaclonal variability within a cell culture, it is necessary to monitor and assess the genetic constitution and stability of the in vitro-regenerated plants. The methodologies involved in that process include the use of several techniques to assess possible alterations at different levels (Devarumath et al 2002;Bhattacharyya et al 2015Bhattacharyya et al , 2017aBose et al 2016;Bhattacharyya and Van Staden 2016). Flow cytometry and chromosome counting are widely used to assess changes in ploidy and chromosome number; PCRbased DNA markers, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), random fragmented length polymorphism (RFLP), inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), microsatellite markers, and start codon targeted (ScoT) polymorphism have been successfully used to evaluate genomic stability of regenerated plants (Hu et al 2008;Collard and Mackill 2009;Bairu et al 2011;Singh et al 2013;Bhattacharyya et al 2014Bhattacharyya et al , 2015Rathore et al 2014;Stanišic et al 2015;Bose et al 2016;Govindaraju and Arulselvi 2016).…”
Section: Improvements In Traditional Culturing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular techniques are most commonly used to detect somaclonal variation, since they are efficient, unaffected by environmental factors, and the results are reproducible and trustworthy. Various conventional molecular markers, including random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSR), and simple sequence repeats (SSR) have been used extensively in the assessment of clonal fidelity (Bhattacharyya et al 2017). These have proven to be a polymorphic, rapid, and simple way to assess somaclonal variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Start codon targeted (SCoT) marker is based on conserved regions flanking the initiation codon sequences (ATG) of genes (Satya et al 2015), by proper reproducibility (Collard and Mackill 2009) which has been employed in genetic diversity analysis of tea (Waheed et al 2017), and other crops (Luo et al 2011;Gao et al 2014;Huang et al 2014;Zeng et al 2014;Mahjbi et al 2015;Xie et al 2015;Yang et al 2015;Feng et al 2016). Both mentioned markers have also been applied to evaluate the genetic stability during micropropagation of plants (Bhattacharyya et al 2014;Rathore et al 2016;Saha et al 2016;Bhattacharyya et al 2017;Kumari et al 2017;Al-Qurainy et al 2018). However, it is the very first time that these two markers (ISSR and SCoT) are being used to assay the genetic stability or possible instability, induced by biotic or abiotic stresses and treatments such as the electromagnetic fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%