2018
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Genetic Parameters for Various Productive Traits in Early Maturing Sugarcane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High variability was recorded for different traits in sugarcane. To make sense of the amount of existing variability in the present clones, range, mean and standard error were calculated [15,16,17] (Table 2). However, range is the crude method of estimation of variability, which indicates observed phenotypic variability only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High variability was recorded for different traits in sugarcane. To make sense of the amount of existing variability in the present clones, range, mean and standard error were calculated [15,16,17] (Table 2). However, range is the crude method of estimation of variability, which indicates observed phenotypic variability only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High variability was recorded for different traits in sugarcane. To make sense of the amount of existing variability in the present clones, range, mean and standard error were calculated [18,19,20] (Table 2) However, range is the crude method of estimation of variability, which indicates observed phenotypic variability only. Among all the clones, yield was recorded from 87.05 t/ha to 148.47 t/ha.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general terms, the G × E interaction corresponds to the differential response of the genotypes to changes in the environments, thus evidencing the dependence between genetic and environmental effects. The importance of the study on G × E interactions is well-recognized (Kumar et al, 2018). In this context, the cultivars exposed to some kind of stress may show a wide range of complex and variable responses which depend on the genotype's inherent sensitivity to stress (Chen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Nutritional Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only trait with negative skewness was sucrose (−0.57). It should be stressed that, along the history of sugarcane breeding, breeding programs have focused on selecting genotypes with increasing ability to accumulate sucrose (Morais et al, 2015;Balsalobre et al, 2016;Kumar et al, 2018). With this in mind and considering that the 20 varieties selected had the ability to yield high sucrose content, a left skewed distribution was expected.…”
Section: Nutritional Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%