2017
DOI: 10.5958/0974-0112.2017.00030.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of genetic diversity in chilli genotypes using multivariate analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fruit length contributed the maximum (43.13 %) towards genetic divergence followed by fruit diameter (21.82 %), fruits/plant (14.34 %), plant spread (N-S) (7.88 %), dry fruit weight (4.04%), ripe fruit weight (3.54), days to 50% flowering (2.32%), seeds/fruit (1.41%) showing the possibility for selection of these characters. Similar findings were also recorded earlier for plant height, secondary branches/plant (Farhad et al, 2010); fruits/plant and fruit length (Hasan et al, 2015); fruits/plant, seeds/fruit, 1000 seed weight, oleoresin and capsaicin contents (Vanitha and Jansirani 2017); primary branches/plant, days to 50% fruiting and fruit length (Bhutia et al, 2017).…”
Section: Multivariate Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Fruit length contributed the maximum (43.13 %) towards genetic divergence followed by fruit diameter (21.82 %), fruits/plant (14.34 %), plant spread (N-S) (7.88 %), dry fruit weight (4.04%), ripe fruit weight (3.54), days to 50% flowering (2.32%), seeds/fruit (1.41%) showing the possibility for selection of these characters. Similar findings were also recorded earlier for plant height, secondary branches/plant (Farhad et al, 2010); fruits/plant and fruit length (Hasan et al, 2015); fruits/plant, seeds/fruit, 1000 seed weight, oleoresin and capsaicin contents (Vanitha and Jansirani 2017); primary branches/plant, days to 50% fruiting and fruit length (Bhutia et al, 2017).…”
Section: Multivariate Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Seven accessions viz., SM-8 ,SM-10, SM-20, SM-18, SM-23, SM-24 and SM-25 had shown fruit yield more than 1000 g. These findings are in confirmation with those reported by Gavade and Ghadage (2015). However, Ahmed et al (2014) reported a very high fruit yield of 5320 g per plant in a study. The wild relatives recorded fruit yield ranging from 63.33 g in SM 30 (S. insanum) to1072.89 g in SM 28 (S. incanum).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%