2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-010-9426-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of genetic diversity in Italian rice germplasm related to agronomic traits and blast resistance (Magnaporthe oryzae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
61
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Arsenal, Atlantis and Libero resulted resistant in our test, instead of Augusto, which appeared to be MS (33 % of infected panicles). Moreover, Faivre-Rampant et al (2011) tested the resistance of several varieties to leaf-blast using nursery method and artificial inoculation with three isolates representative of the three lineages of M. oryzae reported in Italy (Roumen et al 1997). For varieties tested in both this study and Faivre-Rampant et al trials there's generally a good correspondence, despite the different method of resistance class assignment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Arsenal, Atlantis and Libero resulted resistant in our test, instead of Augusto, which appeared to be MS (33 % of infected panicles). Moreover, Faivre-Rampant et al (2011) tested the resistance of several varieties to leaf-blast using nursery method and artificial inoculation with three isolates representative of the three lineages of M. oryzae reported in Italy (Roumen et al 1997). For varieties tested in both this study and Faivre-Rampant et al trials there's generally a good correspondence, despite the different method of resistance class assignment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be due to different factors. First, one of the main goals in Italian rice breeding has always been to select varieties with genetic resistance to neck blast disease; second, after 1990 in Italy were introduced varieties from the US with good blast disease resistance, that were integrated in rice breeding programs (Faivre-Rampant et al 2011); third, cultivars registered in National list in 1967 (the year of constitution of the official National list) were actually selected between 1920 and 1940 (Tamborini et al 2008) and in almost a century of cultivation the pathogen could have overcome host resistance. Moreover, the ability of the fungus to mutate and quickly overcome host resistances is well known and is a major problem for rice breeders (Bonman 1992;Araujo et al 2000;Conaway-Bormans et al 2003;Faivre-Rampant et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with other studies, the mean H e = 0.82 observed in our study was similar to those reported on apple by Urrestarazu et al (2012) (H e = 0.82), Larsen et al (2006) (H e = 0.78), Gasi et al (2010) (H e = 0.78), Pereira-Lorenzo et al (2007) (H e = 0.80), Gharghani et al (2009) (H e = 0.83), Liang et al (2015) (H e = 0.83), and Coart et al (2003) (H e = 0.72 for wild apple populations and 0.77 for ornamental apple populations). Conversely, H e was only 0.44 for grape (Cipriani et al 2010), 0.69 for cacao (Motilal et al 2009) and 0.04 for a self-pollinating species such as rice (Faivre-Rampant et al 2011). The difference with the mean observed heterozygosity (H o = 0.79) could be partly explained because genotypes showing a single peak at a given locus were considered as homozygous, leading to an underestimation of heterozygosity for loci with null alleles that occur at high frequency (Liang et al 2015).…”
Section: Genetic Diversity and Structure Observed In The French Applementioning
confidence: 95%
“…A P (ID) among sibs P (ID)sib was also calculated (Evett and Weir 1998). Finally, the ability of each marker to discriminate two random cultivars was estimated with the Bpower of discrimination^(PD) (Kloosterman et al 1993).…”
Section: Descriptive Statistics Of Genetic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of this event is about 1 every 4 years, and the intensity could lead to yield losses larger than 30 % for the most susceptible varieties. Concerning fungal diseases, they affect rice production regardless from the district; blast represents the most serious and widespread pathogen (Faivre-Rampant et al 2011), requiring the application of chemical treatments on more than 75 % of the Italian rice acreage.…”
Section: The Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%