2019
DOI: 10.1007/s42535-019-00065-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of genetic diversity and phenetic relationships among some Bangladeshi cultivars of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using isozyme and protein profiling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biochemical markers like isozymes and proteins have evolved as a result of the restrictions of morphological markers [ 29 ]. However, the genetic environment of each taxon affects how proteins attach to each other, and as a result, it is advantageous to examine the genetic diversity among cultivars [ 29 ]. SDS-PAGE is an efficient tool for studying the plant genetic variety in a relatively short period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Biochemical markers like isozymes and proteins have evolved as a result of the restrictions of morphological markers [ 29 ]. However, the genetic environment of each taxon affects how proteins attach to each other, and as a result, it is advantageous to examine the genetic diversity among cultivars [ 29 ]. SDS-PAGE is an efficient tool for studying the plant genetic variety in a relatively short period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDS-PAGE analysis can be readily used for a variety of purposes, such as biosystematics research, germplasm differentiation, varietal validation, determination of phylogenetic interactions among different cultivars, and the production of relevant information to balance measurement. SDS-PAGE analysis has been successful in evaluating the relationship between cultivars [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are 2 main branches, branch I and branch II, with a similarity coefficient of 0.3846. According to Habiba et al (2019), the similarity level is far if it is less than 0.6 or 60%. Species with many similarities will have closer kinship relationships; conversely, species with fewer similarities will have more distant kinship relationships (Muntoreanu et al 2011).…”
Section: Phenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%