Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1134/s1995425521070027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Forest-Stand Destruction by Fires Based on Remote-Sensing Data on the Seasonal Distribution of Burned Areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our field‐based estimates of fire‐induced tree mortality were higher than remote sensing‐based estimates of mortality across all northeastern Eurasian boreal forests (∼62%), Eurasian larch forests (∼50%) (Rogers et al., 2015), and the eastern and northeastern Siberian taiga ecoregions (67%) (Shuman et al., 2017). These results support previous analyses that show that fires are more lethal in larch forests than in other Siberian forest types (Bartalev & Stytsenko, 2021; Lupyan et al., 2022), and that fire‐induced tree mortality is higher in northern regions of Siberia (Krylov et al., 2014), including both our subarctic and Arctic sites. Our results indicate that fires in Siberian larch forests result in high mortality, despite larch having traits associated with fire resistance (e.g., high leaf moisture and self‐pruning of lower branches) and low canopy closure (Kharuk et al., 2011; Rogers et al., 2015; Sofronov & Volokitina, 2010; Wirth, 2005).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our field‐based estimates of fire‐induced tree mortality were higher than remote sensing‐based estimates of mortality across all northeastern Eurasian boreal forests (∼62%), Eurasian larch forests (∼50%) (Rogers et al., 2015), and the eastern and northeastern Siberian taiga ecoregions (67%) (Shuman et al., 2017). These results support previous analyses that show that fires are more lethal in larch forests than in other Siberian forest types (Bartalev & Stytsenko, 2021; Lupyan et al., 2022), and that fire‐induced tree mortality is higher in northern regions of Siberia (Krylov et al., 2014), including both our subarctic and Arctic sites. Our results indicate that fires in Siberian larch forests result in high mortality, despite larch having traits associated with fire resistance (e.g., high leaf moisture and self‐pruning of lower branches) and low canopy closure (Kharuk et al., 2011; Rogers et al., 2015; Sofronov & Volokitina, 2010; Wirth, 2005).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This decomposition rate is low because of the low temperature and short growing season 66 relative to tropical forests. Stand-replacing fire is the main cause of natural tree die-off in Siberia 16,67 , increasing the carbon stock of CWD (including dead standing and fallen trees) but meanwhile consuming CWDC. More specifically, the carbon loss from CWDCtot was assumed to be induced by decomposition and combustion by stand-replacing fire.…”
Section: Agctotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying the dNBR threshold [14,21] for the highest-severity fires (Table 2), we have clarified the proportion of stand-replacement fires in the region, which is a very important characteristic of current and future fire regimes. Available estimate [9,16] suggests that up to 30% of burned forests of the region are killed by high-severity fire annually. However, the previously published estimate does not take into account the variability associated with the resistance/vulnerability of certain forest-forming species [4,31,32] to fires in Siberian boreal forests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satellite data are important for determining the degree of forest disturbance [8,9], for calculating direct fire emissions [10], monitoring the post-fire state of soils [11,12], and vegetation cover and their restoration [13,14]. Of particular interest is the problem of identifying post-fire mortality and restoration of tree stands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation