2002
DOI: 10.1680/stco.2002.3.3.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of fire-damaged concrete using crack density measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional way to use core samples in the post-fire assessment is to conduct a petrographic analysis on them. As most of the fire-induced damage are cracks at a microscopic level, microscopy can be used to examine in detail all the damage that occurred due to the fire (Ounundi et al, 2019), but also parameters such as crack density (Short et al, 2002) (Georgali and Tsakiridis, 2005) can be measured to obtain the width of the damaged zone. A commonly used technique is measuring the colour change (Short et al, 2001).…”
Section: Destructive Techniques -Core Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional way to use core samples in the post-fire assessment is to conduct a petrographic analysis on them. As most of the fire-induced damage are cracks at a microscopic level, microscopy can be used to examine in detail all the damage that occurred due to the fire (Ounundi et al, 2019), but also parameters such as crack density (Short et al, 2002) (Georgali and Tsakiridis, 2005) can be measured to obtain the width of the damaged zone. A commonly used technique is measuring the colour change (Short et al, 2001).…”
Section: Destructive Techniques -Core Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar conclusion could be inferred if crack density is employed instead of crack length. Crack density is defined by the ratio between the crack length and the surface area of the respective slab (Short et al, 2002;Litorowicz, 2006;Torrijos et al, 2010). Since both slabs had similar surface area, the shape of the curves obtained (shown in Figure 8(b)) is similar to those, respectively, obtained in Figure 8(a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%