2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12207-021-09413-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Factitious Psychological Presentations (FPP): an Overlooked Response Style in Forensic Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This response style addresses several motivations such as genuinely felt, but markedly distorted, needs regarding the sick role and needs for nurturance. Initial research assesses FPP via the Inventory of Self and Interpersonal Problems (I-SIP; Velsor et al, 2021). DSM-5 categorizes malingering as a "V" code, or a condition that "may be a focus of clinical attention" (APA, 2013, p. 715).…”
Section: Overstated Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This response style addresses several motivations such as genuinely felt, but markedly distorted, needs regarding the sick role and needs for nurturance. Initial research assesses FPP via the Inventory of Self and Interpersonal Problems (I-SIP; Velsor et al, 2021). DSM-5 categorizes malingering as a "V" code, or a condition that "may be a focus of clinical attention" (APA, 2013, p. 715).…”
Section: Overstated Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This response style addresses several motivations such as genuinely felt, but markedly distorted, needs regarding the sick role and needs for nurturance. Initial research assesses FPP via the Inventory of Self and Interpersonal Problems (I‐SIP; Velsor et al., 2021).…”
Section: Conceptual Issues With Response Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%