2016
DOI: 10.6106/kjcem.2016.17.6.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Facility Management Functions for Life-Cycle Information Sharing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lavy et al (2014) identified functions, users, and financial factors to evaluate the performance of facility operations and maintenance [13]. Other studies were also focused mainly on evaluating the potential risks within certain facilities and their impacts on maintenance costs associated with a limited number of factors, such as safety, accidents, and fires [1,6,[14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Point Of Departure: Gaps In Existing Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Lavy et al (2014) identified functions, users, and financial factors to evaluate the performance of facility operations and maintenance [13]. Other studies were also focused mainly on evaluating the potential risks within certain facilities and their impacts on maintenance costs associated with a limited number of factors, such as safety, accidents, and fires [1,6,[14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Point Of Departure: Gaps In Existing Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, to estimate the facility maintenance and repair costs associated with these various potential risk factors, data on the potential costs during the whole life cycle of the facility and the proper tools that are capable of quantitatively analyzing such costs are required. However, to the best knowledge of the research team, existing facility operation management research is far from empirical, as most of the calculations of each potential risk factor are conducted based on literature surveys, questionnaires, and experts' advice [1,18,19]. In turn, very little is still known about analytical modeling frameworks that are underpinned by multiple factors affecting facility maintenance and repair costs.…”
Section: Point Of Departure: Gaps In Existing Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Its techniques, which include lifecycle-cost estimation, address safety and durability, as well as economic considerations [14]. Lee and Jung's [15] comparison of facility-management practices in the United States, Canada, Australia, and South Korea suggests that, although all four countries focused on the operation and management stage, which occupies, on average, 85% of the building lifecycle [13], only Australia emphasized a lifecycle-cost approach to managing costs. Specifically, Lee and Jung [15] conducted a high-volume review of the existing literature on applied facility management and categorized this discipline's functions into 19 types, covering property, service, space, communication, energy, environment, equipment, moves, quality, security, costs, documents, human resources, materials, outsourcing, regulations, schedules, technology, and general management.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%