“…Its techniques, which include lifecycle-cost estimation, address safety and durability, as well as economic considerations [14]. Lee and Jung's [15] comparison of facility-management practices in the United States, Canada, Australia, and South Korea suggests that, although all four countries focused on the operation and management stage, which occupies, on average, 85% of the building lifecycle [13], only Australia emphasized a lifecycle-cost approach to managing costs. Specifically, Lee and Jung [15] conducted a high-volume review of the existing literature on applied facility management and categorized this discipline's functions into 19 types, covering property, service, space, communication, energy, environment, equipment, moves, quality, security, costs, documents, human resources, materials, outsourcing, regulations, schedules, technology, and general management.…”