Assessment of exposure to a flood disaster in a mental-health study

Abstract

The lasting psychological consequences of disasters are an important public health issue, especially for determining the support needed by victims. One important question in evaluating psychological consequences remains the assessment of individual disaster-related experiences or stressors. This article proposes two approaches towards the construction of cumulative exposure indicators (CEIs) for a disaster and discusses their relevance for other disasters. In 1997, we carried out a cross-sectional study of the association between the severity of exposure to a 1992 flood in southeastern France and the prevalence of psychological symptoms 5 years later. We interviewed 500 randomly selected subjects residing in one of the most affected municipalities and constructed two CEIs: one based on relevant articles in the literature and the second based on the results of a principal component analysis (PCA) of all the items exploring exposure to the flood. We compared these CEIs with a map of flood damage and tested the association between these indicators and a score of post-traumatic stress symptoms. Most of the subjects (79.1%) had been exposed to at least one stressor besides physical presence. The two CEIs were significantly correlated with one another; comparisons with the map showed that both had good ability to discriminate between mild and severe exposure. Multiple regression analyses showed a significant exposure-effect relation, of the same level of magnitude and significance, between the posttraumatic stress disorder score and each CEI. Our results show the appropriateness of such indicators in assessing the effect of cumulative stress from natural disasters. Guidelines should be developed to improve the comparability of instruments and help standardize methods for evaluating cumulative stress from disasters insofar as possible. Further research is nonetheless necessary to assess the consistency and reproducibility of the data collected.

Ecosystem Services and Abrupt Transformations in a Coastal Wetland Social-Ecological System: Tubul-Raqui after the 2010 Earthquake in Chile

“…These accounts may be affected by the shocking experience and the impacts suffered and may therefore be not entirely reliable. However, literature suggests that a good recall of disaster experiences is actually possible, even over long periods of time (Baum et al 1983, Verger et al 2003. In our study, the consistence of results with other biophysical reports and the congruence between the magnitude of transformations and the impacts on levels of well-being in different geographical sectors, suggests the validity of respondents' recall.…”

Floods in 2007 and older adult services: lessons learnt

“…[1][2][3][4][5] The most severe involve flash flooding and landslides and are most commonly associated with post-traumatic stress disorder in survivors. 6 The psychological impact of these types of floods is comparable to that of earthquakes, volcanoes and tsunamis. 1,2,5-7 The type of flooding that affected…”

Resilience, vulnerability and adaptive capacity of an inland rural town prone to flooding: a climate change adaptation case study of Charleville, Queensland, Australia

“…Operational briefs are important to identify areas for improvement and lessons learned but do not generally capture the public's perspective (Pfister 2002). Lasting psychological consequences associated with disaster events are another public health issue in determining victim support (Verger et al 2003). Research in the US has found that in disasters communities rely on assistance from many authorities and organisations Gazley et al 2009;McGuire et al 2009) and there is a growing realization that, with the exception of smaller emergencies, no one organisation is capable of doing it all ).…”