2015
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2015.1095812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of exhaust emissions from carbon nanotube production and particle collection by sampling filters

Abstract: This study performed a workplace evaluation of emission control using available air sampling filters and characterized the emitted particles captured in filters. Characterized particles were contained in the exhaust gas released from carbon nanotube (CNT) synthesis using chemical vapor deposition (CVD). Emitted nanoparticles were collected on grids to be analyzed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). CNT clusters in the exhaust gas were collected on filters for investigation. Three types of filters, in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A personal air sampling pump, SKC AirChek ® TOUCH (SKC, PA, USA), to collect samples for subsequent Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis. The samples were collect using a polycarbonate membrane filter (with 25 mm diameter and 0.4 µm porosity) and a heat-treated quartz filter (DPM Cassette with 0.8 µm Impactor), since these types of filters were used in previous studies and proved to be effective for nanomaterials [10][11][12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A personal air sampling pump, SKC AirChek ® TOUCH (SKC, PA, USA), to collect samples for subsequent Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis. The samples were collect using a polycarbonate membrane filter (with 25 mm diameter and 0.4 µm porosity) and a heat-treated quartz filter (DPM Cassette with 0.8 µm Impactor), since these types of filters were used in previous studies and proved to be effective for nanomaterials [10][11][12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%