1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1992.tb00115.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of ethical decisions and values

Abstract: The development and pilot testing of the Professional Decisions and Values Test (PDV) is described. The PDV is designed to assess how ethical conflicts are dealt with by medical and law students and which moral values motivate them. Data from two consecutive classes of entering medical and law students are presented and their action tendencies and ethical values are compared. The findings support the construct validity of the test. Regarding reliability, stability over time is present for action tendencies but… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Validity and reliability were examined in only nine of these assessments (Table 1b). Of these, cognitive outcomes were measured by the following: the Christie Ethical Decision-making Questionnaire (Hoffmaster et al, 1991), the Defining Issues Test (Self et al, 1992), the Professional Decisions Values Test (Rezler et al, 1992) the Savulescu Ethics Competence Tool (Savulescu et al, 1999), the Siegler Assessment (Siegler et al, 1982), the Sulmasy Questionnaire for House Officers (Sulmasy et al, 1995), and the Wenger Orthopaedic Surgeon's Knowledge of Medical Ethics Questionnaire (Wenger & Lieberman, 1998). Behavioral outcomes were measured in two assessments: the Ethics OSCE (Singer et al, 1996) and the Moral Behavior Analysis (Sheehan et al, 1987).…”
Section: Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validity and reliability were examined in only nine of these assessments (Table 1b). Of these, cognitive outcomes were measured by the following: the Christie Ethical Decision-making Questionnaire (Hoffmaster et al, 1991), the Defining Issues Test (Self et al, 1992), the Professional Decisions Values Test (Rezler et al, 1992) the Savulescu Ethics Competence Tool (Savulescu et al, 1999), the Siegler Assessment (Siegler et al, 1982), the Sulmasy Questionnaire for House Officers (Sulmasy et al, 1995), and the Wenger Orthopaedic Surgeon's Knowledge of Medical Ethics Questionnaire (Wenger & Lieberman, 1998). Behavioral outcomes were measured in two assessments: the Ethics OSCE (Singer et al, 1996) and the Moral Behavior Analysis (Sheehan et al, 1987).…”
Section: Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Professional Decisions and Values Test (Rezler et al, 1992) was designed Downloaded by [New York University] at 08:31 03 June 2015…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the use of clinical scenarios gives paper cases higher face validity than questionnaires, but they may suffer from the same potential for response bias. An example is the Professional Decisions and Values Test 60 , which attempts to assess students' underlying values in situations of ethical conflict. This formative test consists of 10 written case vignettes, each followed by a choice of one of three actions and then a further choice of one or two (out of seven) justifications for the action chosen.…”
Section: Paper Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%