2020
DOI: 10.1021/jasms.9b00109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Enzymatic Improvers in Flours Using LC–MS/MS Detection of Marker Tryptic Peptides

Abstract: Enzymatic improvers are enzymes obtained from microbial or fungal cultures, added as technical adjuvants to flour, with the aim of improving the dough characteristics in bakery products. They are used in a low ppm range and, being technical adjuvants, can go undeclared on the label. Many types of enzymatic improvers are present on the market, such as amylases, lipases, proteases, xylanases, glucose oxidases, and others, each with a different function. Analytical methods capable of detecting these enzymes are n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach using discovery-driven proteomics underlined that amylase preparations used in baking generally contain a small number of functional proteins responsible for the hydrolytic activity of the preparation. This was also shown before by Picariello et al and Prandi et al [28,29]. The iBAQ evaluation is suitable for the relative quantitation of several different proteins in one sample [25,30] and it showed differences in the protein composition between the preparations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The approach using discovery-driven proteomics underlined that amylase preparations used in baking generally contain a small number of functional proteins responsible for the hydrolytic activity of the preparation. This was also shown before by Picariello et al and Prandi et al [28,29]. The iBAQ evaluation is suitable for the relative quantitation of several different proteins in one sample [25,30] and it showed differences in the protein composition between the preparations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For the group of maltotetraogenic amylase and the group of maltogenic α-amylase preparations, one amylase each was identified as being responsible for the amylolytic activity. Our results are in accordance with Prandi et al who also identified P19531, a maltogenic α-amylase from G. stearothermophilus, as being responsible for the amylolytic activity in maltogenic α-amylase preparations applied in baking [28]. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to analyze maltotetraogenic amylase preparations with proteomics tools and we identified a single amylase P22963 as cause of the amylolytic activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The dry protein extracts were dissolved in 0.1 M HCl (50 mg in 10 ml) or in 75 mM HCl in 25% acetonitrile and 75% water (25 mg in 4 ml) depending on their solubility. Electrophoresis and identification of the protein bands were carried out as described in a previous work ( 15 ). Briefly, a sample volume corresponding to 30 μg of protein was dried under nitrogen flow and reconstituted with reducing sample buffer (sample buffer XT 4× and reducing agent XT 20×, suitably diluted with distilled water; Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%