2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of environmental impacts and operational costs of the implementation of an innovative source-separated urine treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Membrane stripping or TMCS was first integrated with BES for the TAN recovery from the cathode and to recycle proton shuttles (NH 3 and CO 2 ) between anode and cathode liquid to enhance BES performance (Sleutels et al 2016b ; Kuntke et al 2016 ). Afterwards, TAN recovery in a scaled-up MEC (0.5 m 2 ) using TMCS was successfully demonstrated, showing the potential for an energy-efficient nutrient recovery system (Zamora et al 2017 ; Igos et al 2017 ). The integration of TMCS with an ES and especially in a hydrogen recycling electrochemical system (HRES) showed that TAN recovery can be achieved at higher rates and with comparable energy input to BES (Kuntke et al 2017 ; Rodríguez Arredondo et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Tan Recovery From Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane stripping or TMCS was first integrated with BES for the TAN recovery from the cathode and to recycle proton shuttles (NH 3 and CO 2 ) between anode and cathode liquid to enhance BES performance (Sleutels et al 2016b ; Kuntke et al 2016 ). Afterwards, TAN recovery in a scaled-up MEC (0.5 m 2 ) using TMCS was successfully demonstrated, showing the potential for an energy-efficient nutrient recovery system (Zamora et al 2017 ; Igos et al 2017 ). The integration of TMCS with an ES and especially in a hydrogen recycling electrochemical system (HRES) showed that TAN recovery can be achieved at higher rates and with comparable energy input to BES (Kuntke et al 2017 ; Rodríguez Arredondo et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Tan Recovery From Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using an adapted framework, including an influent generator, alternative scenarios can be assessed, showing that more benefit would be reached by recovering fertilizer and energy from undiluted streams. 111,119,120 Cost analysis models also deserve more attention. Whereas energy cost is generally well known, the market for new valuable products like struvite or polymer can be highly dependent of local situation and regulation, making the approach more speculative and uncertain for such products.…”
Section: The Need For Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, water reclamation remains the main driver in cost analysis. 120 Finally, recent papers describe the feasibility of coupling DM-LCA with multi-objective optimization (MOO). 112,122 The combined frameworks (DM-LCA-MOO) can be applied with three objectives: Effluent Quality Index (EQI), Operational Cost Index (OCI) and environmental impacts quantified through Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA).…”
Section: The Need For Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have attempted to find a method to take advantage of the richness of urine in regards to macro and micronutrients and transform it into natural fertilizers that can be used in agricultural production [4,[9][10][11]. However, the hormones and pharmaceuticals excreted with urine as micro-pollutants can bioaccumulate in plants and be transferred to the food chain, which causes high risks to human health [12][13][14]. Furthermore, urine can contain pathogenic organisms as disease-carriers that can multiply in the soil and contaminate the food web [12,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%