2022
DOI: 10.1080/15434303.2022.2147072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of English Learners and Their Peers in the Content Areas: Expanding What “Counts” as Evidence of Content Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instructional frameworks based on the revised standards are currently being developed and disseminated (e.g., Molle & Wilfrid, 2021), including a framework that specifically addresses MLs in science classrooms (MacDonald et al, 2020). It remains to be seen how the theoretical perspectives that informed the revision of the standards will be operationalized in standards‐based English language proficiency assessments in large‐scale and classroom contexts (Grapin, 2022b).…”
Section: Recent Developments In Science Education With Mlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Instructional frameworks based on the revised standards are currently being developed and disseminated (e.g., Molle & Wilfrid, 2021), including a framework that specifically addresses MLs in science classrooms (MacDonald et al, 2020). It remains to be seen how the theoretical perspectives that informed the revision of the standards will be operationalized in standards‐based English language proficiency assessments in large‐scale and classroom contexts (Grapin, 2022b).…”
Section: Recent Developments In Science Education With Mlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grapin and colleagues (Grapin, 2022a, 2022b; Grapin & Llosa, 2022a, 2022b; Grapin et al, 2022), with support from Educational Testing Service and NSF, explored innovative approaches to science assessment in the context of a yearlong NGSS‐designed curriculum for fifth‐grade MLs and their peers. Specifically, this research addressed a persistent problem that the assessment of MLs' content learning has narrowly privileged learning expressed through linguistic modalities (e.g., written language modality) and independent performance (i.e., what students can do on their own).…”
Section: Emerging Research In Science Education With Mlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As teachers work collaboratively to examine the models, they negotiate different interpretations of students' ideas and clarify the sense‐making goals of the task. Examining models developed by MLs specifically helps teachers recognize how MLs can communicate sophisticated science ideas in unanticipated ways that would otherwise be overlooked if a teacher looked only for the “right” answer or representation (Grapin & Llosa, 2022a, 2022b)—what we call seeing and hearing the science in MLs' ideas, regardless of how those ideas are communicated (Grapin et al, 2022; Grapin, 2023). Thus, collaborative interpretation of student work further supports teachers to develop an asset‐oriented view of MLs (see Design Principle 1).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework For Pd Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every question on the exam needs to adhere to certain practical requirements in order to ensure that students are able to comprehend the material and do well on the test. The purpose of the reliability criteria is to explain how the test should behave in order for it to provide the same result regardless of whether it is used in research on one group of students at one time or on many groups of students at different times (Grapin, 2022). In conclusion, because of the criteria for the study, each individual item in the test comprised a unique combination of strengths and challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%